Izadi Maryam, Gill Daljit S, Naini Farhad B
Specialist Registrar in Orthodontics, Kingston Hospital, Kingston-upon-Thames, Surrey, UK.
Prim Dent Care. 2010 Apr;17(2):73-7. doi: 10.1308/135576110791013712.
To assess the quality of information included in referral letters sent to the orthodontic department at Kingston Hospital, Surrey, UK.
Referral letters sent by both general dental practitioners (GDPs) and specialist orthodontists were analysed retrospectively in order to ascertain the percentage meeting the inclusion criteria as suggested by Mossey (2006) and the British Orthodontic Society (2008) for the quality of information included in an ideal orthodontic referral letter. Thirty-five consecutive letters sent between May and September 2005 and 206 letters sent in the same period in 2008 were collected by hand and analysed against the inclusion criteria. The numbers of referral letters received from GDPs, specialist orthodontists, and others sources were also determined.
Most of the referrals sent in 2005 and 2008 included 40-50% of the referral inclusion points. This was despite an almost twofold increase in the number of referral letters received from specialist orthodontic practitioners in 2008. The majority of the letters, from both GDPs and specialists, did not include details of the oral hygiene or caries status of the patient, or an indication of their motivation towards treatment. None of the referral letters included a plaque score.
The main weaknesses in the quality of information provided in referral letters were that in more than 80% of the letters there was no mention of the patient's medical history and no comment on caries status, the standard of oral hygiene, patient motivation for treatment, or an Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need score. The quality of information included in referral letters sent to Kingston Hospital orthodontic department needs to be improved.
评估发送至英国萨里郡金斯顿医院正畸科的转诊信中所包含信息的质量。
对普通牙科医生(GDPs)和正畸专科医生发送的转诊信进行回顾性分析,以确定符合莫西(2006年)和英国正畸学会(2008年)提出的理想正畸转诊信信息质量纳入标准的百分比。人工收集了2005年5月至9月期间连续发送的35封信以及2008年同期发送的206封信,并对照纳入标准进行分析。还确定了从GDPs、正畸专科医生和其他来源收到的转诊信数量。
2005年和2008年发送的大多数转诊信包含了40 - 50%的转诊纳入要点。尽管2008年从正畸专科医生收到的转诊信数量几乎增加了一倍,但情况依然如此。来自GDPs和专科医生的大多数信件都未包含患者口腔卫生或龋齿状况的详细信息,也未表明他们对治疗的积极性。没有一封转诊信包含菌斑评分。
转诊信中提供的信息质量的主要弱点在于,超过80%的信件未提及患者的病史,也未对龋齿状况、口腔卫生标准、患者治疗积极性或正畸治疗需求指数评分进行评论。发送至金斯顿医院正畸科的转诊信中所包含信息的质量需要提高。