• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Effect of Representational Distance between Meanings on Recognition of Ambiguous Spoken Words.意义之间的表征距离对模糊口语词识别的影响。
Cogn Sci. 2009 Jan;34(1):161-173. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01069.x.
2
Effects of representational distance between meanings on the neural correlates of semantic ambiguity.意义之间的表征距离对语义歧义神经关联的影响。
Brain Lang. 2014 Dec;139:23-35. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2014.10.001. Epub 2014 Oct 23.
3
Tracking neural correlates of contextualized meanings with representational similarity analysis.用表征相似性分析追踪情境化意义的神经关联。
J Neurosci. 2025 Mar 27;45(19). doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0409-24.2025.
4
Brain responses to nouns, verbs and class-ambiguous words in context.大脑在语境中对名词、动词和类别歧义词的反应。
Brain. 2000 Dec;123 Pt 12:2552-66. doi: 10.1093/brain/123.12.2552.
5
No Morphological Markers, No Problem: ERP Study Reveals Semantic Contribution to Distinct Neural Substrates Between Noun and Verb Processing in Online Sentence Comprehension.没有形态标记,没问题:事件相关电位研究揭示在线句子理解中名词和动词加工时语义对不同神经基质的贡献。
Front Neurosci. 2019 Sep 10;13:957. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00957. eCollection 2019.
6
Neurocognitive correlates of category ambiguous verb processing: The single versus dual lexical entry hypotheses.类别模糊动词加工的神经认知相关性:单一与双重词汇条目假说。
Brain Lang. 2019 Jul;194:65-76. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2019.04.005. Epub 2019 May 16.
7
The role of grammatical category information in spoken word retrieval.语法类别信息在口语词汇提取中的作用。
Front Psychol. 2011 Nov 16;2:338. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00338. eCollection 2011.
8
EEG source reconstruction evidence for the noun-verb neural dissociation along semantic dimensions.沿语义维度的名词 - 动词神经分离的脑电图源重建证据。
Neuroscience. 2017 Sep 17;359:183-195. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.07.019. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
9
Activation and maintenance of peripheral semantic features of unambiguous words after right hemisphere brain damage in adults.成人大脑右半球损伤后明确词汇外周语义特征的激活与维持
Aphasiology. 2008 Feb 1;22(2):119-138. doi: 10.1080/02687030601040861.
10
The time course of semantic ambiguity in visual word recognition: behavioral and ERP evidence for the lexical-semantic effect.视觉单词识别中语义歧义的时间进程:词汇 - 语义效应的行为学和事件相关电位证据
Front Psychol. 2024 Jul 9;15:1378125. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1378125. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
The development of real-time spoken and word recognition derives from changes in ability, not maturation.实时口语和单词识别的发展源于能力的变化,而不是成熟。
Cognition. 2024 Oct;251:105899. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105899. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
2
The time course of semantic ambiguity in visual word recognition: behavioral and ERP evidence for the lexical-semantic effect.视觉单词识别中语义歧义的时间进程:词汇 - 语义效应的行为学和事件相关电位证据
Front Psychol. 2024 Jul 9;15:1378125. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1378125. eCollection 2024.
3
The role of category ambiguity in normal and impaired lexical processing: can you without the ?类别歧义在正常和受损词汇加工中的作用:没有“?”你能……吗? (此句英文表述似乎不完整,翻译可能会受影响,这是尽力按字面意思翻译的结果)
Front Hum Neurosci. 2023 May 4;17:1028378. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1028378. eCollection 2023.
4
Neurocognitive correlates of category ambiguous verb processing: The single versus dual lexical entry hypotheses.类别模糊动词加工的神经认知相关性:单一与双重词汇条目假说。
Brain Lang. 2019 Jul;194:65-76. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2019.04.005. Epub 2019 May 16.
5
The complex interactions of context availability, polysemy, word frequency, and orthographic variables during lexical processing.在词汇处理过程中,语境可用性、一词多义、词频和正字法变量的复杂相互作用。
Mem Cognit. 2019 Oct;47(7):1297-1313. doi: 10.3758/s13421-019-00934-4.
6
Friends and foes in the lexicon: homophone naming in aphasia.词汇中的友与敌:失语症中的同音异形词命名
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2015 Jan;41(1):77-94. doi: 10.1037/a0037778. Epub 2014 Oct 20.
7
How meaning similarity influences ambiguous word processing: the current state of the literature.语义相似性如何影响歧义词语处理:文献综述
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Feb;22(1):13-37. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0665-7.
8
Grammatical context constrains lexical competition in spoken word recognition.语法语境在口语单词识别中限制词汇竞争。
Mem Cognit. 2014 May;42(4):676-87. doi: 10.3758/s13421-013-0378-6.
9
The effect of homonymy on learning correctly articulated versus misarticulated words.同音异义词对正确发音与错误发音单词学习的影响。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2013 Apr;56(2):694-707. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2012/12-0122). Epub 2012 Dec 28.
10
Incidental and context-responsive activation of structure- and function-based action features during object identification.在识别物体的过程中,基于结构和功能的动作特征会被偶然激活并对环境做出响应。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Feb;39(1):257-70. doi: 10.1037/a0027533. Epub 2012 Mar 5.

本文引用的文献

1
The dynamics of lexical competition during spoken word recognition.口语词汇识别过程中的词汇竞争动态。
Cogn Sci. 2007 Feb;31(1):133-56. doi: 10.1080/03640210709336987.
2
Natural selection: the impact of semantic impairment on lexical and object decision.自然选择:语义损伤对词汇和物体决策的影响。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2004 Mar 1;21(2):331-52. doi: 10.1080/02643290342000366.
3
Dynamics of activation of semantically similar concepts during spoken word recognition.口语单词识别过程中语义相似概念的激活动态。
Mem Cognit. 2009 Oct;37(7):1026-39. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.7.1026.
4
Statistical and computational models of the visual world paradigm: Growth curves and individual differences.视觉世界范式的统计与计算模型:生长曲线与个体差异
J Mem Lang. 2008 Nov;59(4):475-494. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.006.
5
Effects of Attention on the Strength of Lexical Influences on Speech Perception: Behavioral Experiments and Computational Mechanisms.注意力对词汇影响言语感知强度的作用:行为实验与计算机制
Cogn Sci. 2008 Mar;32(2):398-417. doi: 10.1080/03640210701864063.
6
Attractor dynamics and semantic neighborhood density: processing is slowed by near neighbors and speeded by distant neighbors.吸引子动力学与语义邻域密度:处理过程因近邻而减慢,因远邻而加快。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Jan;34(1):65-79. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.1.65.
7
The role of grammatical class on word recognition.语法类别在单词识别中的作用。
Brain Lang. 2008 Jun;105(3):175-84. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2007.10.003. Epub 2007 Dec 11.
8
The influence of rTMS over prefrontal and motor areas in a morphological task: grammatical vs. semantic effects.重复经颅磁刺激对形态学任务中前额叶和运动区的影响:语法与语义效应
Neuropsychologia. 2008 Jan 31;46(2):764-70. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.10.012. Epub 2007 Oct 24.
9
A basis for generating expectancies for verbs from nouns.从名词生成动词预期的基础。
Mem Cognit. 2005 Oct;33(7):1174-84. doi: 10.3758/bf03193221.
10
The role of semantics and grammatical class in the neural representation of words.语义和语法类别在单词神经表征中的作用。
Cereb Cortex. 2006 Dec;16(12):1790-6. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhj115. Epub 2006 Jan 18.

意义之间的表征距离对模糊口语词识别的影响。

Effect of Representational Distance between Meanings on Recognition of Ambiguous Spoken Words.

作者信息

Mirman Daniel, Strauss Ted J, Dixon James A, Magnuson James S

机构信息

Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Philadelphia, PA.

出版信息

Cogn Sci. 2009 Jan;34(1):161-173. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01069.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01069.x
PMID:20354577
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2846663/
Abstract

Previous research indicates that mental representations of word meanings are distributed along both semantic and syntactic dimensions such that nouns and verbs are relatively distinct from one another. Two experiments examined the effect of representational distance between meanings on recognition of ambiguous spoken words by comparing recognition of unambiguous words, noun-verb homonyms, and noun-noun homonyms. In Experiment 1, auditory lexical decision was fastest for unambiguous words, slower for noun-verb homonyms, and slowest for noun-noun homonyms. In Experiment 2, response times for matching spoken words to pictures followed the same pattern and eye fixation time courses revealed converging, gradual time course differences between conditions. These results indicate greater competition between meanings of ambiguous words when the meanings are from the same grammatical class (noun-noun homonyms) than they when are from different grammatical classes (noun-verb homonyms).

摘要

先前的研究表明,词义的心理表征沿着语义和句法维度分布,使得名词和动词相对彼此不同。两项实验通过比较明确词、名动同音异义词和名名同音异义词的识别情况,研究了词义之间的表征距离对模糊口语词识别的影响。在实验1中,明确词的听觉词汇判断最快,名动同音异义词较慢,名名同音异义词最慢。在实验2中,将口语词与图片匹配的反应时间遵循相同模式,并且眼动注视时间进程揭示了不同条件之间逐渐趋同的时间进程差异。这些结果表明,当模糊词的词义来自相同语法类别(名名同音异义词)时,其词义之间的竞争比来自不同语法类别(名动同音异义词)时更大。