Department of Public Health, Temple University, Ritter Annex, 9th Floor, 004-09, 1301 Cecil B. Moore Ave, Philadelphia, PA 19122-6091, USA.
J Natl Med Assoc. 2010 Mar;102(3):174-82. doi: 10.1016/s0027-9684(15)30523-x.
Discussion of the pros and cons of prostate cancer screening tests, rather than routine screening, is recommended to support informed screening decisions, particularly among African American men. This study explored physician explanation of pros and cons of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test and digital rectal exam (DRE) and its association with knowledge and screening attitudes. Two hundred-one African American men were asked if a physician had ever provided a comprehensive explanation of pros and cons of the PSA test and DRE. All men completed a 10-item prostate cancer knowledge scale and a subset completed a 26-item attitudes measure. Only 13% of the sample reported receiving a comprehensive explanation. Also, prostate cancer knowledge in the sample was low (mean = 43% correct). Multivariate analyses revealed that total prostate cancer knowledge was associated with men receiving a comprehensive explanation (p = .05), as well as past prostate cancer screening (p = .02) and younger age (p = .009). Although comprehensive explanation of prostate cancer screening was related to total prostate cancer knowledge, it was unrelated to a subset of items that may be central to fully informed screening decisions. Furthermore, comprehensive explanation of prostate cancer screening (p = .02), along with DRE recommendation (p = .009) and older age (p = .02), were related to fewer negative screening attitudes. Findings suggest that continued focus on patient education and physician communication is warranted.
讨论前列腺癌筛查测试的利弊,而不是常规筛查,建议支持知情的筛查决策,特别是在非裔美国男性中。本研究探讨了医生对前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)测试和直肠指检(DRE)的利弊的解释及其与知识和筛查态度的关系。201 名非裔美国男性被问及医生是否曾经对 PSA 测试和 DRE 的利弊进行过全面解释。所有男性都完成了一个包含 10 个项目的前列腺癌知识量表,一部分男性还完成了一个包含 26 个项目的态度量表。只有 13%的样本报告接受了全面解释。此外,该样本中的前列腺癌知识水平较低(平均正确回答率为 43%)。多变量分析显示,前列腺癌总体知识与男性接受全面解释(p =.05)、过去的前列腺癌筛查(p =.02)和较年轻的年龄(p =.009)有关。尽管对前列腺癌筛查的全面解释与前列腺癌总体知识有关,但与可能对充分知情的筛查决策至关重要的一组项目无关。此外,前列腺癌筛查的全面解释(p =.02)、DRE 推荐(p =.009)和较年长的年龄(p =.02)与较少的负面筛查态度有关。研究结果表明,需要继续关注患者教育和医生沟通。