Loma Linda University School of Behavioral Health, 11065 Campus St, Loma Linda, CA, 92350, USA.
Institute for Community Partnerships, Loma Linda University, 11188 Anderson Street, Loma Linda, CA, 92350, USA.
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2022 Jun;9(3):874-885. doi: 10.1007/s40615-021-01027-2. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
Black men are disproportionately affected by prostate cancer (PCa) incidence and mortality. Limited research has been reported on the ethnic differences among Black men in regard to family history, knowledge, and screening habits. Thus, this study was conducted to understand and compare knowledge levels and family history of the three main Black subgroups (African Americans, Caribbean immigrants, and African immigrants) in the USA and to assess the influence of knowledge on past screening behavior and intentionality for screening in the future for PCa. A concurrent mixed-methods design was used with participants (N = 396) recruited from different parts of the country. The grounded theory method of analysis was used for qualitative data and a logistic regression was used to explain the relationship between screening intentionality and PCa knowledge and family history. Qualitative results indicated that subjective PCa knowledge between the three subgroups was relatively similar but differed based on whether a person knew a family member or friend who had been affected by the disease. Themes focused on risk, PCa education, screening, and impact on sexuality. Quantitatively, result revealed that there are ethnic differences in knowledge across the three subgroups. Additionally, regression results revealed that family history is a stronger predictor of screening behavior and intentionality than knowledge. This study was able to unveil a deeper understanding on the role of family history and knowledge on PCa among Black subgroups.
黑人男性在前列腺癌(PCa)发病率和死亡率方面受到不成比例的影响。关于黑人男性在家族史、知识和筛查习惯方面的种族差异,有限的研究已经有报道。因此,本研究旨在了解和比较美国三个主要黑人亚群(非裔美国人、加勒比移民和非洲移民)的知识水平和家族史,并评估知识对过去筛查行为和未来 PCa 筛查意向的影响。本研究采用同时进行的混合方法设计,从全国各地招募了 396 名参与者。定性数据分析采用扎根理论方法,逻辑回归用于解释筛查意向与 PCa 知识和家族史之间的关系。定性结果表明,三个亚组之间的主观 PCa 知识相对相似,但基于一个人是否认识受疾病影响的家庭成员或朋友而有所不同。主题集中在风险、PCa 教育、筛查和对性的影响上。定量结果显示,三个亚组之间的知识存在种族差异。此外,回归结果表明,家族史是筛查行为和意向的更强预测因素,而不是知识。本研究能够揭示出家族史和知识在黑人亚群中对 PCa 的影响的更深入理解。