• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[结直肠癌高危人群的筛查]

[Screening of high-risk group with colorectal cancer].

作者信息

Xu An-gao, Yu Zhi-jin, Zhong Xu-hui, Gan Ai-hua, Liu Ji-hong, Luo Qiu-yun

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Huizhou Municipal Central Hospital, Huizhou Institute of Medicine, Guangdong Province, Huizhou 516001, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2010 Jan 12;90(2):116-8.

PMID:20356496
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To measure the rate of high-risk group and the detection rate of colorectal cancer (CRC) in communities in Guangdong province and to provide scientific rationales for formulating mass screening plans in high-risk group.

METHODS

Mass survey was conducted by questionnaire combined fecal occult blood test (FOBT) in Huizhou region, Guangdong Province, to sort out the high-risk population of CRC. Then the high-risk population was screened by colonoscopy and pathology to identify CRC. The differences were compared by direct expenditure which was used to calculate screening cost.

RESULTS

A total of 68,953 people were surveyed. There were 940 people in high-risk group (detection rate: 1.36%), 3118 in immunity FOBT positive group (detection rate: 4.52%), Merging aforementioned two groups, there were 3870 in population at risk (detection rate: 5.61%). The CRC detection rate in high-risk group, immunity FOBT positive group, population at risk and average-risk group was 506.3/10(5), 314.3/10(5), 315.9/10(5) and 17.7/10(5) respectively. The positive predictive value of CRC screening scheme by high-risk group questionnaire-colonoscopy was 0.43% while CRC screening scheme by FOBT-colonoscopy 0.22%. In terms of direct expenditure of CRC per case in high-risk group and immunity FOBT positive group was 47,834.5 yuan and 82,303.6 yuan. The latter was 1.7 times than that of the former.

CONCLUSIONS

The scheme of questionnaire combined FOBT for CRC is an effective way in mass survey. The scheme by high-risk group questionnaire-colonoscopy has a much better cost-effectiveness than that of the scheme by FOBT-colonoscopy so that it should be one of the preferred methods for individual screening in high-risk group.

摘要

目的

测算广东省社区人群中结直肠癌(CRC)高危人群比例及结直肠癌检出率,为制定高危人群大规模筛查方案提供科学依据。

方法

在广东省惠州市地区采用问卷调查结合粪便潜血试验(FOBT)进行大规模调查,梳理出CRC高危人群。然后对高危人群进行结肠镜检查及病理检查以确诊CRC。通过计算直接费用比较差异,以计算筛查成本。

结果

共调查68953人。高危人群940人(检出率:1.36%),免疫FOBT阳性人群3118人(检出率:4.52%),将上述两组合并,高危人群共3870人(检出率:5.61%)。高危人群、免疫FOBT阳性人群、高危人群及平均风险人群中CRC检出率分别为506.3/10万、314.3/10万、315.9/10万和17.7/10万。高危人群问卷调查 - 结肠镜检查CRC筛查方案的阳性预测值为0.43%,而FOBT - 结肠镜检查CRC筛查方案的阳性预测值为0.22%。高危人群和免疫FOBT阳性人群中每例CRC的直接费用分别为47834.5元和82303.6元。后者是前者的1.7倍。

结论

问卷结合FOBT筛查CRC的方案是大规模调查的有效方法。高危人群问卷调查 - 结肠镜检查方案的成本效益远优于FOBT - 结肠镜检查方案,应成为高危人群个体筛查的首选方法之一。

相似文献

1
[Screening of high-risk group with colorectal cancer].[结直肠癌高危人群的筛查]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2010 Jan 12;90(2):116-8.
2
Cost-effectiveness analysis on screening for colorectal neoplasm and management of colorectal cancer in Asia.亚洲结直肠肿瘤筛查及结直肠癌管理的成本效益分析
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008 Aug 1;28(3):353-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03726.x.
3
Randomized trial of different screening strategies for colorectal cancer: patient response and detection rates.结直肠癌不同筛查策略的随机试验:患者反应及检出率
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Mar 2;97(5):347-57. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji050.
4
[Chemical or immunological tests for the detection of fecal occult blood in colorectal cancer screening?].[用于结直肠癌筛查中粪便潜血检测的化学或免疫检测?]
Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 Oct;32(8):565-76. doi: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2009.01.179. Epub 2009 Jul 3.
5
[Screening for colorectal cancer in high-risk and intermediate-risk subject: what's the best tool?].[高危和中危人群的结直肠癌筛查:最佳工具是什么?]
Recenti Prog Med. 2009 Feb;100(2):68-72.
6
The public prefers fecal occult blood test over colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening.在结直肠癌筛查方面,公众更喜欢粪便潜血试验而非结肠镜检查。
Eur J Cancer Prev. 2008 Oct;17(5):430-7. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0b013e328305a0fa.
7
Evaluation of a selective screening for colorectal carcinoma: the Taiwan Multicenter Cancer Screening (TAMCAS) project.结直肠癌选择性筛查评估:台湾多中心癌症筛查(TAMCAS)项目
Cancer. 1999 Oct 1;86(7):1116-28.
8
Adding familial risk assessment to faecal occult blood test can increase the effectiveness of population-based colorectal cancer screening.将家族风险评估添加到粪便潜血试验中可以提高基于人群的结直肠癌筛查的效果。
Eur J Cancer. 2011 Jul;47(10):1571-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.01.022. Epub 2011 Feb 28.
9
Increase in screening for colorectal cancer in older Americans: results from a national survey.美国老年人结直肠癌筛查增加:一项全国性调查结果
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 Aug;56(8):1511-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01796.x. Epub 2008 Jul 24.
10
Colorectal cancer screening behavior in women attending screening mammography: longitudinal trends and predictors.接受乳腺钼靶筛查的女性的结直肠癌筛查行为:纵向趋势及预测因素
Womens Health Issues. 2005 Nov-Dec;15(6):249-57. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2005.06.001.

引用本文的文献

1
Rational Use of Computed Tomography for Individual Health Assessment in Asymptomatic Population: Chinese Experience.计算机断层扫描在无症状人群个体健康评估中的合理应用:中国经验
Chin Med J (Engl). 2016 Feb 5;129(3):348-56. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.174504.