UCLA, School of Nursing, 700 Tiverton Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1702, USA.
J Community Health. 2010 Aug;35(4):423-32. doi: 10.1007/s10900-010-9266-1.
This randomized, controlled study (n = 256) was conducted to compare three interventions designed to promote hepatitis A virus (HAV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccination completion, among clients undergoing methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) in Los Angeles and Santa Monica. The participants were randomized into three groups: Motivational Interviewing-Single Session (MI-Single), Motivational Interviewing-Group (MI-Group), or Nurse-Led Hepatitis Health Promotion (HHP). All three treatment groups received the 3-series HAV/HBV vaccine. The MI sessions were provided by trained therapists, the Nurse-Led HHP sessions were delivered by a research nurse. The main outcome variable of interest was improvement in HBV and HCV knowledge, measured by a 6-item HBV and a 7-item HCV knowledge and attitude tool that was administered at baseline and at 6-month follow-up. The study results showed that there was a significant increase in HBV- and HCV-related knowledge across all three groups (p < 0.0001). There were no significant differences found with respect to knowledge acquisition among the groups. Irrespective of treatment group, gender (P = 0.008), study site (P < 0.0001) and whether a participant was abused as a child (P = 0.017) were all found to be predictors of HCV knowledge improvement; only recruitment site (P < 0.0001) was found to be a predictor of HBV knowledge. The authors concluded that, although MI-Single, MI-Group and Nurse-Led HHP are all effective in promoting HBV and HCV knowledge acquisition among MMT clients, Nurse-Led HHP may be the method of choice for this population as it may be easier to integrate and with additional investigation may prove to be more cost efficient.
这项随机对照研究(n = 256)旨在比较三种干预措施,以促进在洛杉矶和圣莫尼卡接受美沙酮维持治疗(MMT)的患者中完成甲型肝炎病毒(HAV)和乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)疫苗接种。参与者被随机分为三组:单一疗程动机访谈(MI-Single)、小组动机访谈(MI-Group)或护士主导的肝炎健康促进(HHP)。所有三组治疗组均接受了 HAV/HBV 三系列疫苗接种。MI 疗程由经过培训的治疗师提供,护士主导的 HHP 疗程由研究护士提供。主要观察变量是 HBV 和 HCV 知识的改善,通过在基线和 6 个月随访时使用 6 项 HBV 和 7 项 HCV 知识和态度工具进行测量。研究结果表明,所有三组的 HBV 和 HCV 相关知识均显著增加(p < 0.0001)。但在知识获取方面,各组之间没有发现显著差异。无论治疗组如何,性别(P = 0.008)、研究地点(P < 0.0001)和参与者是否在儿童时期受到虐待(P = 0.017)均被发现是 HCV 知识改善的预测因素;只有招募地点(P < 0.0001)被发现是 HBV 知识的预测因素。作者得出结论,尽管 MI-Single、MI-Group 和护士主导的 HHP 都能有效促进 MMT 患者的 HBV 和 HCV 知识获取,但护士主导的 HHP 可能是该人群的首选方法,因为它可能更容易整合,并且通过进一步研究可能证明更具成本效益。