• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Magnetoencephalography in the study of human auditory information processing.

作者信息

Sams M, Hari R

机构信息

Low Temperature Laboratory, Helsinki University of Technology, Espoo, Finland.

出版信息

Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1991;620:102-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1991.tb51577.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1991.tb51577.x
PMID:2035937
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Magnetoencephalography in the study of human auditory information processing.
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1991;620:102-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1991.tb51577.x.
2
The planum temporale as a computational hub.颞平面作为一个计算中枢。
Trends Neurosci. 2002 Jul;25(7):348-53. doi: 10.1016/s0166-2236(02)02191-4.
3
The neural code for interaural time difference in human auditory cortex.人类听觉皮层中两耳时间差的神经编码。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Feb;127(2):EL60-5. doi: 10.1121/1.3290744.
4
Oscillatory alpha modulations in right auditory regions reflect the validity of acoustic cues in an auditory spatial attention task.右侧听觉区域的振荡性阿尔法调制反映了听觉空间注意任务中声学线索的有效性。
Cereb Cortex. 2014 Oct;24(10):2579-90. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bht113. Epub 2013 May 3.
5
Semantic and acoustic analysis of speech by functional networks with distinct time scales.具有不同时间尺度的功能网络对语音的语义和声学分析。
Brain Res. 2010 Jul 30;1346:132-44. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.05.027. Epub 2010 May 16.
6
Processing of novel sounds and frequency changes in the human auditory cortex: magnetoencephalographic recordings.人类听觉皮层中新型声音的处理及频率变化：脑磁图记录
Psychophysiology. 1998 Mar;35(2):211-24.
7
Hemispheric asymmetry of auditory evoked fields elicited by spectral versus temporal stimulus change.由频谱与时间刺激变化引发的听觉诱发电场的半球不对称性。
Cereb Cortex. 2009 Oct;19(10):2290-7. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhn245. Epub 2009 Jan 8.
8
Effects of center frequency on binaural auditory filter bandwidth in the human brain.中心频率对人脑中双耳听觉滤波器带宽的影响。
Neuroreport. 2008 Nov 19;19(17):1709-13. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3283177f99.
9
Evidence for rapid auditory perception as the foundation of speech processing: a sparse temporal sampling fMRI study.以快速听觉感知作为言语处理基础的证据：一项稀疏时间采样功能磁共振成像研究。
Eur J Neurosci. 2004 Nov;20(9):2447-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03687.x.
10
Human auditory cortical dynamics during perception of long acoustic sequences: phase tracking of carrier frequency by the auditory steady-state response.长声序列感知过程中的人类听觉皮层动力学：听觉稳态反应对载波频率的相位跟踪
Cereb Cortex. 2004 Jan;14(1):35-46. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhg089.

引用本文的文献

1
Is a paired-stimuli configuration necessary to obtain typical evoked response differences in studies of psychosis? An MEG study.在精神病研究中，获得典型的诱发反应差异是否需要配对刺激配置？一项脑磁图研究。
Biomark Neuropsychiatry. 2021 Jun;4. doi: 10.1016/j.bionps.2021.100033. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
2
Effects of Presentation Rate and Attention on Auditory Discrimination: A Comparison of Long-Latency Auditory Evoked Potentials in School-Aged Children and Adults.呈现速率和注意力对听觉辨别力的影响：学龄儿童与成人长潜伏期听觉诱发电位的比较
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 14;10(9):e0138160. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138160. eCollection 2015.
3
Attention effects on auditory scene analysis in children.
注意力对儿童听觉场景分析的影响。
Neuropsychologia. 2009 Feb;47(3):771-85. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.12.007. Epub 2008 Dec 13.
4
Neural responses to auditory stimulus deviance under threat of electric shock revealed by spatially-filtered magnetoencephalography.通过空间滤波脑磁图揭示电击威胁下对听觉刺激偏差的神经反应。
Neuroimage. 2007 Aug 1;37(1):282-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.04.055. Epub 2007 May 18.
5
Neurophysiological evidence for context-dependent encoding of sensory input in human auditory cortex.人类听觉皮层中感觉输入的上下文依赖编码的神经生理学证据。
Brain Res. 2006 Feb 23;1075(1):165-74. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.12.074. Epub 2006 Feb 3.
6
Responses of the human auditory cortex to changes in one versus two stimulus features.
Exp Brain Res. 1993;97(1):177-83. doi: 10.1007/BF00228828.