Suppr超能文献

尽管在一般实践中对高血压患者进行了抗高血压治疗,但实施对其的依从性支持:一项集群随机试验。

Implementation of adherence support for patients with hypertension despite antihypertensive therapy in general practice: a cluster randomized trial.

机构信息

IQ Healthcare, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Am J Hypertens. 2010 Sep;23(9):1038-45. doi: 10.1038/ajh.2010.63. Epub 2010 Apr 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Uncontrolled hypertension despite treatment is highly prevalent among hypertension patients. Electronic monitoring of medication adherence has been proven to be effective in improving blood pressure. The aim of the study was to compare the effectiveness of intensive support for implementation of this tool in community pharmacies with minimal implementation support.

METHODS

In a cluster randomized trial, 25 control pharmacies received a manual and 32 experimental pharmacies received intensive support to enhance implementation of electronic monitoring.

PRIMARY OUTCOME

the number of patients included for electronic monitoring. Secondary outcomes included mean change in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and percentage of patients with adequate SBP control.

RESULTS

The experimental group yielded consistently higher scores on all the steps of the implementation process than the control group, but none of these differences were significant. The mean number of patients per pharmacy included for electronic monitoring in a 3-9-months period was 1.6 in the experimental group vs. 1.0 in the control group (difference = 0.7, 95% confidence interval = -0.4; 1.7). The following patient outcomes were pooled because there were no differences between the experimental and the control group. Mean change of SBP/diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was -12 and -6 mm Hg, respectively, SBP dropped <140 mm Hg in 20.9% of all patients. In 13.6% of all patients control of SBP was achieved without treatment intensification.

CONCLUSION

The intensive implementation program enhanced pharmacist performance, but appeared insufficient to overcome all problems with the implementation of electronic monitoring. The major restrictive factors concerned general practitioner (GP) involvement and the identification of eligible patients.

摘要

背景

尽管进行了治疗,高血压患者的血压仍不受控制,这一情况非常普遍。电子监测药物依从性已被证明可有效改善血压。本研究旨在比较在社区药房中强化实施该工具与最小实施支持的效果。

方法

在一项集群随机试验中,25 家对照药房收到了手册,而 32 家实验组药房则获得了强化支持,以增强电子监测的实施。

主要结果

纳入电子监测的患者数量。次要结果包括收缩压(SBP)的平均变化和血压控制充分的患者比例。

结果

实验组在实施过程的所有步骤中的得分均始终高于对照组,但这些差异均无统计学意义。在 3-9 个月期间,每家药房纳入电子监测的患者平均数量为实验组 1.6 人,对照组 1.0 人(差异=0.7,95%置信区间=-0.4;1.7)。由于实验组和对照组之间没有差异,因此汇总了以下患者结局。SBP/舒张压(DBP)的平均变化分别为-12 和-6mmHg,所有患者中 SBP 下降<140mmHg 的比例为 20.9%。在所有患者中,有 13.6%的患者无需加强治疗即可控制 SBP。

结论

强化实施计划提高了药剂师的绩效,但似乎不足以克服电子监测实施过程中的所有问题。主要的限制因素涉及全科医生(GP)的参与和合格患者的确定。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验