• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

尽管在一般实践中对高血压患者进行了抗高血压治疗,但实施对其的依从性支持:一项集群随机试验。

Implementation of adherence support for patients with hypertension despite antihypertensive therapy in general practice: a cluster randomized trial.

机构信息

IQ Healthcare, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Am J Hypertens. 2010 Sep;23(9):1038-45. doi: 10.1038/ajh.2010.63. Epub 2010 Apr 1.

DOI:10.1038/ajh.2010.63
PMID:20360753
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Uncontrolled hypertension despite treatment is highly prevalent among hypertension patients. Electronic monitoring of medication adherence has been proven to be effective in improving blood pressure. The aim of the study was to compare the effectiveness of intensive support for implementation of this tool in community pharmacies with minimal implementation support.

METHODS

In a cluster randomized trial, 25 control pharmacies received a manual and 32 experimental pharmacies received intensive support to enhance implementation of electronic monitoring.

PRIMARY OUTCOME

the number of patients included for electronic monitoring. Secondary outcomes included mean change in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and percentage of patients with adequate SBP control.

RESULTS

The experimental group yielded consistently higher scores on all the steps of the implementation process than the control group, but none of these differences were significant. The mean number of patients per pharmacy included for electronic monitoring in a 3-9-months period was 1.6 in the experimental group vs. 1.0 in the control group (difference = 0.7, 95% confidence interval = -0.4; 1.7). The following patient outcomes were pooled because there were no differences between the experimental and the control group. Mean change of SBP/diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was -12 and -6 mm Hg, respectively, SBP dropped <140 mm Hg in 20.9% of all patients. In 13.6% of all patients control of SBP was achieved without treatment intensification.

CONCLUSION

The intensive implementation program enhanced pharmacist performance, but appeared insufficient to overcome all problems with the implementation of electronic monitoring. The major restrictive factors concerned general practitioner (GP) involvement and the identification of eligible patients.

摘要

背景

尽管进行了治疗,高血压患者的血压仍不受控制,这一情况非常普遍。电子监测药物依从性已被证明可有效改善血压。本研究旨在比较在社区药房中强化实施该工具与最小实施支持的效果。

方法

在一项集群随机试验中,25 家对照药房收到了手册,而 32 家实验组药房则获得了强化支持,以增强电子监测的实施。

主要结果

纳入电子监测的患者数量。次要结果包括收缩压(SBP)的平均变化和血压控制充分的患者比例。

结果

实验组在实施过程的所有步骤中的得分均始终高于对照组,但这些差异均无统计学意义。在 3-9 个月期间,每家药房纳入电子监测的患者平均数量为实验组 1.6 人,对照组 1.0 人(差异=0.7,95%置信区间=-0.4;1.7)。由于实验组和对照组之间没有差异,因此汇总了以下患者结局。SBP/舒张压(DBP)的平均变化分别为-12 和-6mmHg,所有患者中 SBP 下降<140mmHg 的比例为 20.9%。在所有患者中,有 13.6%的患者无需加强治疗即可控制 SBP。

结论

强化实施计划提高了药剂师的绩效,但似乎不足以克服电子监测实施过程中的所有问题。主要的限制因素涉及全科医生(GP)的参与和合格患者的确定。

相似文献

1
Implementation of adherence support for patients with hypertension despite antihypertensive therapy in general practice: a cluster randomized trial.尽管在一般实践中对高血压患者进行了抗高血压治疗,但实施对其的依从性支持:一项集群随机试验。
Am J Hypertens. 2010 Sep;23(9):1038-45. doi: 10.1038/ajh.2010.63. Epub 2010 Apr 1.
2
Comparison of fixed-dose combinations of telmisartan/hydrochlorothiazide 40/12.5 mg and 80/12.5 mg and a fixed-dose combination of losartan/hydrochlorothiazide 50/12.5 mg in mild to moderate essential hypertension: pooled analysis of two multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-end point (PROBE) trials.替米沙坦/氢氯噻嗪40/12.5毫克和80/12.5毫克固定剂量组合与氯沙坦/氢氯噻嗪50/12.5毫克固定剂量组合治疗轻度至中度原发性高血压的比较:两项多中心、前瞻性、随机、开放标签、盲终点(PROBE)试验的汇总分析
Clin Ther. 2005 Nov;27(11):1795-805. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.11.014.
3
Efficacy and safety of two ramipril and hydrochlorothiazide fixed-dose combination formulations in adults with stage 1 or stage 2 arterial hypertension evaluated by using ABPM.使用 ABPM 评估两种雷米普利和氢氯噻嗪固定剂量复方制剂在 1 期或 2 期动脉高血压成人中的疗效和安全性。
Clin Ther. 2013 May;35(5):702-10. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2013.03.015. Epub 2013 Apr 25.
4
Impact of a community pharmacists' hypertension-care service on medication adherence. The AFenPA study.社区药剂师高血压护理服务对药物依从性的影响。AFenPA 研究。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2013 Nov-Dec;9(6):797-805. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2012.12.006. Epub 2013 Feb 4.
5
The (cost-)effectiveness of a patient-tailored intervention programme to enhance adherence to antihypertensive medication in community pharmacies: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial.一项针对社区药房患者定制干预方案以提高抗高血压药物依从性的(成本-)效益分析:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Jan 19;18(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1696-3.
6
A 26-week, prospective, open-label, uncontrolled, multicenter study to evaluate the effect of an escalating-dose regimen of trandolapril on change in blood pressure in treatment-naive and concurrently treated adult hypertensive subjects (TRAIL).一项为期26周的前瞻性、开放标签、非对照、多中心研究,旨在评估逐步递增剂量的群多普利方案对初治和同时接受治疗的成年高血压受试者血压变化的影响(TRAIL研究)。
Clin Ther. 2007 Feb;29(2):305-15. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.02.016.
7
Manidipine versus enalapril monotherapy in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, 24-week study.马尼地平与依那普利单药治疗高血压合并2型糖尿病患者的多中心、随机、双盲、24周研究。
Clin Ther. 2005 Feb;27(2):166-73. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.02.001.
8
Effectiveness of valsartan for treatment of hypertension: patient profiling and hierarchical modeling of determinants and outcomes (the PREVIEW study).缬沙坦治疗高血压的有效性:患者特征分析及决定因素与结局的分层建模(PREVIEW研究)
Ann Pharmacother. 2009 May;43(5):849-61. doi: 10.1345/aph.1L576. Epub 2009 Apr 7.
9
Efficacy and tolerability of nebivolol monotherapy by baseline systolic blood pressure: a retrospective analysis of pooled data from two multicenter, 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, dose-ranging studies in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension.根据基线收缩压评估比索洛尔单药治疗的疗效和耐受性:两项多中心、12 周、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行分组、剂量范围研究的汇总数据的回顾性分析,这些研究纳入了轻至中度原发性高血压患者。
Clin Ther. 2009 Sep;31(9):1946-56. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.08.028.
10
Nebivolol monotherapy for patients with systolic stage II hypertension: results of a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.比索洛尔单药治疗收缩期 II 期高血压患者:一项随机、安慰剂对照试验的结果。
Clin Ther. 2013 Feb;35(2):142-52. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2012.12.015. Epub 2013 Jan 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Does increased implementation support improve community clinics' guideline-concordant care? Results of a mixed methods, pragmatic comparative effectiveness trial.增加实施支持是否能提高社区诊所符合指南的护理水平?一项混合方法、实用比较有效性试验的结果。
Implement Sci. 2019 Dec 5;14(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0948-5.
2
Interventions to Improve Medication Adherence in Hypertensive Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.改善高血压患者药物依从性的干预措施:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Curr Hypertens Rep. 2015 Dec;17(12):94. doi: 10.1007/s11906-015-0606-5.
3
Study protocol for "Study of Practices Enabling Implementation and Adaptation in the Safety Net (SPREAD-NET)": a pragmatic trial comparing implementation strategies.
“安全网实施与适应实践研究(SPREAD-NET)”的研究方案:一项比较实施策略的实用试验
Implement Sci. 2015 Oct 16;10:144. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0333-y.
4
Exploring the implementation of a medication adherence programme by community pharmacists: a qualitative study.社区药剂师实施药物依从性计划的探索:一项定性研究。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2014 Oct;36(5):1014-22. doi: 10.1007/s11096-014-9989-7. Epub 2014 Aug 20.