Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Maryland School of Medicine and Greenebaum Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland 21201-1595, USA.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Apr;71(4):686-93. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.01.042.
Few options exist for patients with localized esophageal cancer ineligible for conventional therapies. Endoscopic spray cryotherapy with low-pressure liquid nitrogen has demonstrated efficacy in this setting in early studies.
To assess the safety and efficacy of cryotherapy in esophageal carcinoma.
Multicenter, retrospective cohort study.
Ten academic and community medical centers between 2006 and 2009.
Subjects with esophageal carcinoma in whom conventional therapy failed and those who refused or were ineligible for conventional therapy.
Cryotherapy with follow-up biopsies. Treatment was complete when tumor eradication was confirmed by biopsy or when treatment was halted because of tumor progression, patient preference, or comorbid condition.
Complete eradication of luminal cancer and adverse events.
Seventy-nine subjects (median age 76 years, 81% male, 94% with adenocarcinoma) were treated. Tumor stage included T1-60, T2-16, and T3/4-3. Mean tumor length was 4.0 cm (range 1-15 cm). Previous treatment including endoscopic resection, photodynamic therapy, esophagectomy, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy failed in 53 subjects (67%). Forty-nine completed treatment. Complete response of intraluminal disease was seen in 31 of 49 subjects (61.2%), including 18 of 24 (75%) with mucosal cancer. Mean (standard deviation) length of follow-up after treatment was 10.6 (8.4) months overall and 11.5 (2.8) months for T1 disease. No serious adverse events were reported. Benign stricture developed in 10 (13%), with esophageal narrowing from previous endoscopic resection, radiotherapy, or photodynamic therapy noted in 9 of 10 subjects.
Retrospective study design, short follow-up.
Spray cryotherapy is safe and well tolerated for esophageal cancer. Short-term results suggest that it is effective in those who could not receive conventional treatment, especially for those with mucosal cancer.
对于不符合传统治疗条件的局限性食管癌患者,选择有限。早期研究显示,内镜下喷射式液氮冷冻疗法在这一领域具有疗效。
评估冷冻疗法治疗食管癌的安全性和疗效。
多中心回顾性队列研究。
2006 年至 2009 年间的 10 家学术和社区医疗中心。
传统治疗失败的食管癌患者,以及拒绝或不适合传统治疗的患者。
冷冻疗法并进行随访活检。当肿瘤通过活检得到完全消除,或由于肿瘤进展、患者意愿或合并症而停止治疗时,治疗即完成。
管腔癌症的完全消除和不良事件。
79 例患者(中位年龄 76 岁,81%为男性,94%为腺癌)接受了治疗。肿瘤分期包括 T1-60、T2-16 和 T3/4-3。平均肿瘤长度为 4.0cm(范围 1-15cm)。53 例(67%)患者之前的治疗包括内镜下切除、光动力疗法、食管切除术、化疗和放疗失败。49 例患者完成了治疗。49 例患者中,31 例(61.2%)观察到腔内疾病完全缓解,其中 24 例(75%)黏膜癌患者完全缓解。总体治疗后中位随访时间为 10.6(8.4)个月,T1 疾病为 11.5(2.8)个月。未报告严重不良事件。10 例(13%)发生良性狭窄,其中 9 例(90%)狭窄与之前的内镜下切除、放疗或光动力治疗有关。
回顾性研究设计,随访时间短。
喷射式冷冻疗法治疗食管癌安全且耐受良好。短期结果表明,该疗法对不能接受常规治疗的患者,特别是黏膜癌患者有效。