Institute of Microbiology and Immunology, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Stem Cells Dev. 2010 Dec;19(12):1895-910. doi: 10.1089/scd.2009.0485. Epub 2010 Oct 12.
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) found in bone marrow (BM)-MSCs are an attractive source for the regeneration of damaged tissues. Alternative postnatal, perinatal, and fetal sources of MSCs are also under intensive investigation. MSCs from the Wharton's jelly matrix of umbilical cord (WJ)-MSCs have higher pancreatic and endothelial differentiation potentials than BM-MSCs, but the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. We compared the gene expression profiles, enriched canonical pathways, and genetic networks of BM-MSCs and WJ-MSCs. WJ-MSCs express more angiogenesis- and growth-related genes including epidermal growth factor and FLT1, whereas BM-MSCs express more osteogenic genes such as RUNX2, DLX5, and NPR3. The gene expression pattern of BM-MSCs is more similar to osteoblasts than WJ-MSCs, suggesting a better osteogenic potential. In contrast, WJ-MSCs are more primitive because they share more common genes with embryonic stem cells. BM-MSCs are more sensitive to environmental stimulations because their molecular signatures altered more significantly in different culture conditions. WJ-MSCs express genes enriched in vascular endothelial growth factor and PI3K-NFκB canonical pathways, whereas BM-MSCs express genes involved in antigen presentation and chemokine/cytokine pathways. Drylab results could be verified by wetlab experiments, in which BM-MSCs were more efficient in osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation, whereas WJ-MSCs proliferated better. WJ-MSCs thus constitute a promising option for angiogenesis, whereas BM-MSCs in bone remodeling. Our results reveal systematically the underlying genes and regulatory networks of 2 MSCs from unique ontological and anatomical origins, as well as the resulted phenotypes, thereby providing a better basis for cell-based therapy and the following mechanistic studies on MSC biology.
骨髓间充质干细胞(MSCs)是一种有吸引力的组织损伤修复来源。其他产后、围产期和胎儿来源的 MSCs 也在被深入研究。与骨髓间充质干细胞(BM-MSCs)相比,来自脐带华通氏胶基质的间充质干细胞(WJ-MSCs)具有更高的胰腺和内皮分化潜能,但潜在机制尚不清楚。我们比较了 BM-MSCs 和 WJ-MSCs 的基因表达谱、富集的经典途径和遗传网络。WJ-MSCs 表达更多的血管生成和生长相关基因,包括表皮生长因子和 FLT1,而 BM-MSCs 则表达更多的成骨基因,如 RUNX2、DLX5 和 NPR3。BM-MSCs 的基因表达模式与成骨细胞更相似,提示其具有更好的成骨潜能。相比之下,WJ-MSCs 更原始,因为它们与胚胎干细胞有更多共同的基因。BM-MSCs 对环境刺激更敏感,因为它们在不同的培养条件下的分子特征变化更为显著。WJ-MSCs 表达的基因富集于血管内皮生长因子和 PI3K-NFκB 经典途径,而 BM-MSCs 表达的基因则参与抗原呈递和趋化因子/细胞因子途径。干实验结果可以通过湿实验验证,其中 BM-MSCs 在成骨和成脂分化方面更有效,而 WJ-MSCs 增殖更好。因此,WJ-MSCs 是血管生成的理想选择,而 BM-MSCs 则适用于骨重塑。我们的研究结果系统地揭示了这两种来自独特的本体论和解剖学起源的 MSC 背后的基因和调控网络,以及由此产生的表型,从而为细胞治疗和随后对 MSC 生物学的机制研究提供了更好的基础。
Stem Cell Rev Rep. 2025-9-3
World J Cardiol. 2025-1-26
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2024-7-26
Inflammopharmacology. 2024-6