Česnik Ana Bajc, Švajger Urban
Slovenian Institute for Transfusion Medicine, Department for Therapeutic Services, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2024 Jul 26;12:1400347. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2024.1400347. eCollection 2024.
Mesenchymal stromal stem cells (MSCs) possess a remarkable potential for numerous clinical applications due to their unique properties including self-renewal, immunomodulation, paracrine actions and multilineage differentiation. However, the translation of MSC-based Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products (ATMPs) into the clinic has frequently met with inconsistent outcomes. One of the suspected reasons for this issue is the inherent and extensive variability that exists among such ATMPs, which makes the interpretation of their clinical efficacy difficult to assess, as well as to compare the results of various studies. This variability stems from numerous reasons including differences in tissue sources, donor attributes, variances in manufacturing protocols, as well as modes of administration. MSCs can be isolated from various tissues including bone marrow, umbilical cord, adipose tissue and others, each with its unique phenotypic and functional characteristics. While MSCs from different sources do share common features, they also exhibit distinct gene expression profiles and functional properites. Donor-specific factors such as age, sex, body mass index, and underlying health conditions can influence MSC phenotype, morphology, differentiation potential and function. Moreover, variations in preparation of MSC products introduces additional heterogeneity as a result of cell culture media composition, presence or absence of added growth factors, use of different serum supplements and culturing techniques. Once MSC products are formulated, storage protocols play a pivotal role in its efficacy. Factors that affect cell viability include cell concentration, delivery solution and importantly, post-thawing protocols where applicable. Ensuing, differences in administration protocols can critically affect the distribution and functionallity of administered cells. As MSC-based therapies continue to advance through numerous clinical trials, implication of strategies to reduce product heterogeneity is imperative. Central to addressing these challenges is the need for precise prediction of clinical responses, which require well-defined MSC populations and harmonized assessment of their specific functions. By addressing these issues by meaningful approaches, such as, e.g., MSC pooling, the field can overcome barriers to advance towards more consistent and effective MSC-based therapies.
间充质基质干细胞(MSCs)因其具有自我更新、免疫调节、旁分泌作用和多向分化等独特特性,在众多临床应用中具有巨大潜力。然而,基于MSCs的先进治疗药物产品(ATMPs)转化为临床应用时,其结果常常不一致。该问题的一个可疑原因是此类ATMPs之间存在内在的广泛变异性,这使得评估其临床疗效以及比较各项研究结果变得困难。这种变异性源于多种原因,包括组织来源、供体属性、生产方案的差异以及给药方式。MSCs可从多种组织中分离获得,包括骨髓、脐带、脂肪组织等,每种组织都有其独特的表型和功能特征。虽然不同来源的MSCs确实具有共同特征,但它们也表现出不同的基因表达谱和功能特性。供体特异性因素,如年龄、性别、体重指数和潜在健康状况,可影响MSCs的表型、形态、分化潜能和功能。此外,MSCs产品制备过程中的差异,由于细胞培养基成分、是否添加生长因子、使用不同的血清补充剂和培养技术,会引入额外的异质性。一旦制备好MSCs产品,储存方案对其疗效起着关键作用。影响细胞活力的因素包括细胞浓度、输送溶液,重要的是,适用时的解冻后方案。随后,给药方案的差异会严重影响给药细胞的分布和功能。随着基于MSCs的疗法在众多临床试验中不断推进,采取策略减少产品异质性势在必行。应对这些挑战的核心是需要精确预测临床反应,这需要明确界定的MSCs群体及其特定功能的统一评估。通过有意义的方法,如MSCs汇集,来解决这些问题,该领域可以克服障碍,朝着更一致、有效的基于MSCs的疗法迈进。