National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-1428, USA.
Brain. 2010 May;133(Pt 5):1526-36. doi: 10.1093/brain/awq054. Epub 2010 Apr 5.
Conversion disorder is characterized by neurological signs and symptoms related to an underlying psychological issue. Amygdala activity to affective stimuli is well characterized in healthy volunteers with greater amygdala activity to both negative and positive stimuli relative to neutral stimuli, and greater activity to negative relative to positive stimuli. We investigated the relationship between conversion disorder and affect by assessing amygdala activity to affective stimuli. We conducted a functional magnetic resonance imaging study using a block design incidental affective task with fearful, happy and neutral face stimuli and compared valence contrasts between 16 patients with conversion disorder and 16 age- and gender-matched healthy volunteers. The patients with conversion disorder had positive movements such as tremor, dystonia or gait abnormalities. We also assessed functional connectivity between the amygdala and regions associated with motor preparation. A group by affect valence interaction was observed. Post hoc analyses revealed that whereas healthy volunteers had greater right amygdala activity to fearful versus neutral compared with happy versus neutral as expected, there were no valence differences in patients with conversion disorder. There were no group differences observed. The time course analysis also revealed greater right amygdala activity in patients with conversion disorder for happy stimuli (t = 2.96, P = 0.006) (with a trend for fearful stimuli, t = 1.81, P = 0.08) compared with healthy volunteers, with a pattern suggestive of impaired amygdala habituation even when controlling for depressive and anxiety symptoms. Using psychophysiological interaction analysis, patients with conversion disorder had greater functional connectivity between the right amygdala and the right supplementary motor area during both fearful versus neutral, and happy versus neutral 'stimuli' compared with healthy volunteers. These results were confirmed with Granger Causality Modelling analysis indicating a directional influence from the right amygdala to the right supplementary motor area to happy stimuli (P < 0.05) with a similar trend observed to fearful stimuli (P = 0.07). Our data provide a potential neural mechanism that may explain why psychological or physiological stressors can trigger or exacerbate conversion disorder symptoms in some patients. Greater functional connectivity of limbic regions influencing motor preparatory regions during states of arousal may underlie the pathophysiology of motor conversion symptoms.
转换障碍的特征是与潜在心理问题相关的神经体征和症状。在健康志愿者中,杏仁核对情感刺激的活动得到了很好的描述,与中性刺激相比,杏仁核对负性和正性刺激的活动更大,与正性刺激相比,杏仁核对负性刺激的活动更大。我们通过评估杏仁核对情感刺激的活动来研究转换障碍与情感的关系。我们使用带有恐惧、快乐和中性面孔刺激的功能磁共振成像块设计偶发情感任务进行了一项研究,并比较了 16 名转换障碍患者和 16 名年龄和性别匹配的健康志愿者之间的效价对比。转换障碍患者有震颤、肌张力障碍或步态异常等阳性运动。我们还评估了杏仁核与运动准备相关区域之间的功能连接。观察到组与情感效价的相互作用。事后分析表明,健康志愿者对恐惧刺激的右杏仁核活动大于中性刺激,对快乐刺激的右杏仁核活动大于中性刺激,这与预期相符,而转换障碍患者则没有效价差异。未观察到组间差异。时间进程分析还显示,与健康志愿者相比,转换障碍患者对快乐刺激的右杏仁核活动更大(t = 2.96,P = 0.006)(对恐惧刺激有趋势,t = 1.81,P = 0.08),即使控制抑郁和焦虑症状,也表明杏仁核习惯化受损。使用心理生理相互作用分析,与健康志愿者相比,转换障碍患者在恐惧刺激与中性刺激、快乐刺激与中性刺激的“刺激”期间,右杏仁核与右辅助运动区之间的功能连接更强。使用格兰杰因果关系建模分析得到了类似的结果,表明右杏仁核对快乐的刺激有定向影响(P < 0.05),对恐惧刺激也有类似的趋势(P = 0.07)。我们的数据提供了一个潜在的神经机制,可能解释为什么心理或生理应激源会在某些患者中引发或加剧转换障碍症状。在觉醒状态下,影响运动准备区域的边缘区域的功能连接增强,可能是运动转换症状的病理生理学基础。