Saint Vincent's Hospital, Manhattan, NY 10024, USA.
Psychiatr Q. 2010 Sep;81(3):253-62. doi: 10.1007/s11126-010-9134-2.
The Insanity Defense of Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity is the defense used by some mentally disordered defendants who do not have the capacity for understanding right and wrong at the time of their criminal act. This defense has perplexed legal and mental health professionals for centuries. Though it has been a part of the legal system since the early Greeks, it has been and continues to be amended, modified, and in some jurisdictions, abolished. Moreover, despite its infrequent use, many in our society hold onto the belief that defendants can evade criminal responsibility by means of this defense. Furthermore, insanity is often equated with psychosis; however, the two are not the same and have different connotations. It is essential for any clinical psychiatrist to understand the concept of the insanity defense and how it differs from psychosis. This paper will clarify the meaning and purpose of the insanity defense and will differentiate insanity and psychosis.
精神错乱辩护,即无罪的精神错乱辩护,是一些精神错乱的被告在犯罪时没有理解是非对错的能力时所使用的辩护。这一辩护在几个世纪以来一直困扰着法律和心理健康专业人士。尽管自古希腊以来它一直是法律体系的一部分,但它一直在被修订、修改,在一些司法管辖区甚至被废除。此外,尽管这种辩护很少被使用,但我们社会中的许多人仍然认为被告可以通过这种辩护逃避刑事责任。此外,精神错乱通常与精神病等同;然而,两者并不相同,具有不同的含义。任何临床精神病学家都必须理解精神错乱辩护的概念以及它与精神病的区别。本文将澄清精神错乱辩护的含义和目的,并区分精神错乱和精神病。