Suppr超能文献

门诊微波子宫内膜消融术:未经子宫内膜准备的随机对照试验与标准日间手术加子宫内膜准备的 5 年随访。

Outpatient microwave endometrial ablation: 5-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial without endometrial preparation versus standard day surgery with endometrial preparation.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, UK.

出版信息

BJOG. 2010 Mar;117(4):493-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02476.x.

Abstract

The objective was to compare long-term outcomes following outpatient microwave endometrial ablation in the postmenstrual phase with those following day surgery microwave endometrial ablation after standard drug-based endometrial preparation. Of the women originally recruited, 154/197 (78%) returned questionnaires. The primary outcome of satisfaction was high in both groups (71% postmenses versus 65% preparation) as were the amenorrhoea rates (84% versus 87%). There was no significant difference in the hysterectomy rates between the two arms. It can be concluded that microwave endometrial ablation outcomes are not affected in the long term by undertaking the procedure in the postmenstrual phase in an outpatient setting.

摘要

目的是比较经门诊在月经后期行微波子宫内膜消融术与标准药物准备后日间手术行微波子宫内膜消融术的长期疗效。在最初招募的女性中,154/197(78%)人返回了问卷。两组的主要结局满意度均较高(月经后为 71%,准备后为 65%),闭经率也相似(84%对 87%)。两组的子宫切除术率无显著差异。可以得出结论,在门诊环境中经月经后期行微波子宫内膜消融术不会影响长期疗效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验