Plaza Jose A, Ortega Pablo F, Stockman David L, Suster Saul
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
J Cutan Pathol. 2010 Apr;37(4):403-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0560.2010.01517.x.
The distinction of metastatic carcinomas to the skin from poorly differentiated primary cutaneous carcinomas and sometimes primary benign adnexal tumors can pose a significant diagnostic challenge. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of p63 and podoplanin (D2-40) immunoreactivity for separating primary skin tumors vs. cutaneous metastases of carcinomas from internal organs. Thirty seven primary tumors and 42 cutaneous metastatic adenocarcinomas were evaluated. The 37 primary cutaneous tumors included 14 cases of benign adnexal tumors, 9 malignant skin adnexal neoplasms, and 14 primary squamous and basal cell carcinomas. The 42 metastatic adenocarcinomas all corresponded to metastases from patients with a well-documented history of a primary tumor at another location. We found variable positivity with podoplanin in all primary cutaneous neoplasms including spiradenoma (6/6), hidradenoma (2/4), cylindroma (3/3), desmoplastic trichilemmoma (1/1), poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma (4/4), sebaceous carcinoma (1/1), basal cell carcinoma (4/10), trichilemmal carcinoma (2/2), eccrine carcinoma (3/3), microcystic adnexal carcinoma (1/1), adnexal carcinoma NOS (1/1), and porocarcinoma (1/1). In contrast, all metastatic carcinomas were negative (0/42) for podoplanin. In regards to p63, all cases of primary cutaneous tumors were positive for p63 (37/37); in contrast, all cutaneous metastatic carcinomas were negative (0/42). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of podoplanin and p63 immunoreactivity to separate primary skin neoplasms from metastatic carcinomas were 78.4, 100.0, 100.0 and 84.0% for podoplanin, respectively, and 100.0, 100.0, 100.0 and 100.0% for p63, respectively. The differences in p63 and podoplanin immunohistochemical expression between primary skin tumors and metastatic carcinomas to the skin were statistically significant (p < 0, 0001). The results of our study suggest that the combined expression of p63 and podoplanin are a useful adjunct for the diagnosis of skin tumors in the clinical setting of a questionable metastasis and may be relatively specific for distinguishing primary skin tumors from metastatic carcinomas to the skin.
皮肤转移性癌与低分化原发性皮肤癌以及有时与原发性良性附属器肿瘤的鉴别可能构成重大的诊断挑战。本研究的目的是评估p63和足板蛋白(D2-40)免疫反应性在区分原发性皮肤肿瘤与来自内脏器官的癌性皮肤转移瘤中的作用。对37例原发性肿瘤和42例皮肤转移性腺癌进行了评估。37例原发性皮肤肿瘤包括14例良性附属器肿瘤、9例恶性皮肤附属器肿瘤以及14例原发性鳞状细胞癌和基底细胞癌。42例转移性腺癌均对应于有明确另一部位原发性肿瘤病史患者的转移瘤。我们发现,在所有原发性皮肤肿瘤中,足板蛋白呈不同程度阳性,包括汗腺螺旋瘤(6/6)、汗腺瘤(2/4)、圆柱瘤(3/3)、促结缔组织增生性外毛根鞘瘤(1/1)、低分化鳞状细胞癌(4/4)、皮脂腺癌(1/1)、基底细胞癌(4/10)、外毛根鞘癌(2/2)、小汗腺癌(3/3)、微囊性附属器癌(1/1)、未特指的附属器癌(1/1)和导管癌(1/1)。相比之下,所有转移性癌的足板蛋白均为阴性(0/42)。关于p63,所有原发性皮肤肿瘤病例均为p63阳性(37/37);相比之下,所有皮肤转移性癌均为阴性(0/42)。足板蛋白和p63免疫反应性在区分原发性皮肤肿瘤与转移性癌方面的敏感性、特异性以及阳性和阴性预测值分别为:足板蛋白78.4%、100.0%、100.0%和84.0%,p63分别为100.0%、100.0%、100.0%和100.0%。原发性皮肤肿瘤与皮肤转移性癌之间p63和足板蛋白免疫组化表达的差异具有统计学意义(p < 0.0001)。我们的研究结果表明,在存在可疑转移的临床情况下,p63和足板蛋白的联合表达对皮肤肿瘤的诊断是一种有用的辅助手段,并且在区分原发性皮肤肿瘤与皮肤转移性癌方面可能具有相对特异性。