Suppr超能文献

体外评估饰面陶瓷与氧化锆的抗剪粘结强度。

In vitro evaluation of shear bond strength of veneering ceramics to zirconia.

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Yeditepe University, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Dent Mater J. 2010 Mar;29(2):138-46.

Abstract

The bond strength between veneering ceramic and zirconia framework is the weakest link in the layered structure. To investigate the shear bond strength (SBS) of veneering ceramics to zirconia, four types of zirconia ceramics (Zirkonzahn, Cercon, Lava, DC-Zirkon) were selected. For each zirconia system, 30 disk specimens were layered with IPS e.max Ceram, Vita VM9, and a manufacturer-recommended veneering ceramic. SBS test was conducted, and fracture surface analysis was also performed to determine the failure modes. One-way ANOVA, two-way ANOVA, and Tukey's HSD tests were used to analyze the data. On shear bond strength between zirconia and their recommended veneering ceramics, statistically significant differences were observed among the different zirconia systems (p<0.001). DC-Zirkon exhibited the highest SBS value (40.49+/-8.43 MPa), followed by Lava (27.11+/-2.72 MPa), Zirkonzahn (24.46+/-3.72 MPa), and Cercon (20.19+/-5.12 MPa). On shear bond strength to IPS e.max Ceram and Vita VM9, significantly lower (p<0.001) were observed for these veneering ceramics than their recommended veneering ceramics for DC-Zirkon and Lava. For Zirkonzahn and Cercon, similar SBS values were observed for all kinds of veneering ceramics (p>0.05). In conclusion, the bonding of manufacturer-recommended veneering ceramic to the zirconia framework differed according to zirconia type.

摘要

贴面陶瓷与氧化锆基底层之间的结合强度是分层结构中的最薄弱环节。为了研究贴面陶瓷与氧化锆的剪切结合强度(SBS),选择了四种类型的氧化锆陶瓷(Zirkonzahn、Cercon、Lava、DC-Zirkon)。对于每种氧化锆系统,用 IPS e.max Ceram、Vita VM9 和制造商推荐的贴面陶瓷分层 30 个圆盘试件。进行 SBS 测试,并进行断裂面分析以确定失效模式。使用单向方差分析、双向方差分析和 Tukey 的 HSD 检验来分析数据。在氧化锆与其推荐的贴面陶瓷之间的剪切结合强度方面,不同氧化锆系统之间存在显著差异(p<0.001)。DC-Zirkon 表现出最高的 SBS 值(40.49+/-8.43 MPa),其次是 Lava(27.11+/-2.72 MPa)、Zirkonzahn(24.46+/-3.72 MPa)和 Cercon(20.19+/-5.12 MPa)。对于 IPS e.max Ceram 和 Vita VM9 的 SBS 值,观察到这些贴面陶瓷的 SBS 值明显低于(p<0.001)其为 DC-Zirkon 和 Lava 推荐的贴面陶瓷。对于 Zirkonzahn 和 Cercon,对于所有类型的贴面陶瓷,观察到相似的 SBS 值(p>0.05)。总之,制造商推荐的贴面陶瓷与氧化锆基底层的结合根据氧化锆类型而有所不同。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验