Department of Advanced General Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, 50 Yonsei-Ro, Seodaemun-Gu, Seoul, 03722, South Korea.
Department of Dentistry, Inha University Hospital, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.
Sci Rep. 2023 Jun 6;13(1):9153. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-36181-6.
This study aimed to evaluate the mechanical properties of zirconia fabricated using additive manufacturing technology and compare them to those of zirconia fabricated using subtractive manufacturing technology. Sixty disc-shaped specimens were fabricated for the additive (n = 30) and subtractive manufacturing groups (n = 30), and each group was divided into two subgroups according to their air-abrasion surface treatment: control (n = 15) and air-abrasion groups (n = 15). Mechanical properties including the flexural strength (FS), Vickers hardness, and surface roughness were determined, and the values were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test (α = 0.05). X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopy were used for phase analysis and surface topography evaluation, respectively. The SMA group exhibited the highest FS (1144.97 ± 168.1 MPa), followed by the SMC (944.58 ± 141.38 MPa), AMA (905.02 ± 111.38 MPa), and AMC groups (763.55 ± 68.69 MPa). The Weibull distribution showed the highest scale value (1213.55 MPa) in the SMA group, with the highest shape value in the AMA group (11.69). A monoclinic peak was not detected in both the AMC and SMC groups, but after air abrasion, the monoclinic phase content ([Formula: see text]) reached 9% in the AMA group, exceeding that in the SMA group (7%). The AM groups exhibited statistically lower FS values than those of the SM groups under the same surface treatment (p < 0.05). Air-abrasion surface treatment increased the monoclinic phase content and FS (p < 0.05) in both the additive and subtractive groups, while it increased the surface roughness (p < 0.05) only in the additive group and did not affect the Vickers hardness in either group. For zirconia manufactured using additive technology, the mechanical properties are comparable to those of zirconia manufactured using subtractive technology.
本研究旨在评估使用增材制造技术制造的氧化锆的机械性能,并将其与使用减材制造技术制造的氧化锆进行比较。为增材(n = 30)和减材制造组(n = 30)分别制备了 60 个盘形试件,每个组根据其喷丸表面处理进一步分为两组:对照组(n = 15)和喷丸组(n = 15)。通过单向方差分析和 Tukey 事后检验(α = 0.05)确定了包括弯曲强度(FS)、维氏硬度和表面粗糙度在内的机械性能。使用 X 射线衍射和扫描电子显微镜分别进行相分析和表面形貌评估。SMA 组的 FS(1144.97 ± 168.1 MPa)最高,其次是 SMC(944.58 ± 141.38 MPa)、AMA(905.02 ± 111.38 MPa)和 AMC 组(763.55 ± 68.69 MPa)。威布尔分布显示 SMA 组的比例值最高(1213.55 MPa),AMA 组的形状值最高(11.69)。在 AMC 和 SMC 组中均未检测到单斜峰,但喷丸后,AMA 组的单斜相含量([Formula: see text])达到 9%,超过 SMA 组(7%)。在相同的表面处理下,AM 组的 FS 值明显低于 SM 组(p < 0.05)。喷丸表面处理增加了增材和减材组的单斜相含量和 FS(p < 0.05),但仅增加了增材组的表面粗糙度(p < 0.05),而对两组的维氏硬度均无影响。对于使用增材技术制造的氧化锆,其机械性能可与使用减材技术制造的氧化锆相媲美。