Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Am J Cardiol. 2010 Apr 15;105(8):1192-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.11.048. Epub 2010 Mar 5.
The noninvasive estimation of pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) has become a standard component of the echocardiographic examination. Our aim was to evaluate the accuracy of this modality in a large series of unselected studies obtained in clinical practice. All right heart catheterizations during a 4-year period were reviewed. Studies with echocardiographic findings available within 48 hours were evaluated for PASP agreement. In an effort to mirror clinical practice, the right heart catheterization findings were used as the reference standard and the PASP values were taken directly from the respective clinical reports. Overall, 792 right heart catheterization-echocardiogram pairs were identified. Echocardiographic PASP could not be estimated in 174 of these studies (22.0%). The correlation between modalities was moderate, but agreement was poor (bias 9.0%, 95% limits of agreement -53.2% to 71.2%, r = 0.52, p <0.001). Misclassification of clinical PASP categories occurred more often than not (54.4%). Multivariate analysis using multiple potential sources of error could only account for 3.2% of the total variation in the discrepancy between the study modalities (p = 0.003). In conclusion, noninvasively estimated PASP had limited agreement with the invasively determined PASP, and misclassification of PASP clinical categories occurred frequently. Given the widespread use of echocardiographically determined PASP, these data are in need of replication in a large prospective study.
肺动脉收缩压(PASP)的无创估测已成为超声心动图检查的标准组成部分。我们的目的是评估这种方法在大量临床实践中获得的非选择性研究中的准确性。回顾了 4 年内的所有右心导管检查。对在 48 小时内有超声心动图检查结果的研究进行了 PASP 一致性评估。为了模拟临床实践,将右心导管检查结果作为参考标准,并直接从相应的临床报告中获取 PASP 值。总体而言,共确定了 792 对右心导管-超声心动图检查。在这些研究中,有 174 项研究(22.0%)无法估计超声心动图 PASP。两种方法之间的相关性为中度,但一致性较差(偏倚 9.0%,95%一致性界限-53.2%至 71.2%,r=0.52,p<0.001)。临床 PASP 分类的错误分类比不常见(54.4%)。使用多种潜在误差源的多变量分析只能解释研究方法之间差异的总变异的 3.2%(p=0.003)。总之,非侵入性估计的 PASP与侵入性确定的 PASP一致性有限,并且 PASP 临床分类的错误分类经常发生。鉴于超声心动图确定的 PASP 广泛应用,这些数据需要在一项大型前瞻性研究中进行复制。