Pritzker School of Medicine Section of Cardiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medical Center, and the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
Chest. 2011 May;139(5):988-993. doi: 10.1378/chest.10-1269. Epub 2010 Sep 23.
Recent studies suggest that Doppler echocardiography (DE)-based estimates of pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) may not be as accurate as previously believed. We sought to determine the accuracy of PASP measurements using DE compared with right-sided heart catheterization (RHC) in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH).
We compared DE estimates of PASP to invasively measure PASP during RHC in 160 consecutive patients with PH (part one). To account for possible changes in hemodynamics between DE and RHC, we then prospectively determined PASP in an additional 23 consecutive patients undergoing simultaneous RHC and DE (part two). Bland-Altman analyses were performed to evaluate the agreement between RHC and DE measurements of PASP. Accuracy was predefined as 95% limits of agreement within ± 10 mm Hg for PASP estimates.
In part one, there was moderate correlation between DE and RHC measurements of PASP (r = 0.68, P < .001). However, using Bland-Altman analysis, the bias for DE estimates of PASP was 2.2 mm Hg with 95% limits of agreement ranging from -34.2 to 38.6 mm Hg. DE estimates of PASP were determined to be inaccurate in 50.6% of patients. In part two, there was moderate correlation between DE and RHC measurements of PASP (r = 0.71, P < .01). However, despite simultaneous DE and RHC measurements, the bias for DE estimates of PASP was 8.0 mm Hg with 95% limits of agreement ranging from -28.4 to 44.4 mm Hg.
DE estimates of PASP are inaccurate in patients with PH and should not be relied on to make the diagnosis of PH or to follow the efficacy of therapy.
最近的研究表明,多普勒超声心动图(DE)估计的肺动脉收缩压(PASP)可能不如之前认为的那么准确。我们旨在确定 DE 测量 PASP 的准确性,与肺动脉高压(PH)患者的右侧心导管检查(RHC)相比。
我们将 DE 估计的 PASP 与 RHC 期间的侵入性测量 PASP 进行比较,在 160 例连续 PH 患者中进行(第一部分)。为了考虑 DE 和 RHC 之间可能的血流动力学变化,我们随后在 23 例连续接受同时 RHC 和 DE 的患者中前瞻性地确定 PASP(第二部分)。进行 Bland-Altman 分析以评估 RHC 和 DE 测量 PASP 之间的一致性。将准确性定义为 PASP 估计值的 95%一致性界限内为±10mmHg。
在第一部分中,DE 和 RHC 测量的 PASP 之间存在中度相关性(r = 0.68,P <.001)。然而,使用 Bland-Altman 分析,DE 估计 PASP 的偏差为 2.2mmHg,95%一致性界限范围为-34.2 至 38.6mmHg。DE 估计的 PASP 在 50.6%的患者中不准确。在第二部分中,DE 和 RHC 测量的 PASP 之间存在中度相关性(r = 0.71,P <.01)。然而,尽管同时进行 DE 和 RHC 测量,但 DE 估计 PASP 的偏差为 8.0mmHg,95%一致性界限范围为-28.4 至 44.4mmHg。
PH 患者的 DE 估计的 PASP 不准确,不应依赖于诊断 PH 或监测治疗效果。