Mis-investigating alleged research misconduct can cause widespread, unpredictable damage.
作者信息
Hey Edmund, Chalmers Iain
出版信息
J R Soc Med. 2010 Apr;103(4):133-8. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2010.09k045.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Mis-investigating alleged research misconduct can cause widespread, unpredictable damage.
J R Soc Med. 2010 Apr;103(4):133-8. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2010.09k045.
2
The CNEP trial: how a good trial was turned rotten.
J R Soc Med. 2010 Apr;103(4):121-2. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2010.10k018.
3
Regulating research, regulating professionals.
J R Soc Med. 2010 Apr;103(4):125-6. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2010.10k013.
4
A very public break-up.
BMJ. 2010 Jan 18;340:c110. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c110.
5
Investigating allegations of research misconduct: the vital need for due process.
BMJ. 2000 Sep 23;321(7263):752-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7263.752.
6
In-house plagiarism and editorial unaccountability.
J Bioeth Inq. 2015 Mar;12(1):21-3. doi: 10.1007/s11673-015-9620-1. Epub 2015 Feb 25.
7
Inquiring into inquiries.
BMJ. 2000 Sep 23;321(7263):715-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7263.715.
8
Improving authorship accountability: ethical considerations in manuscript preparation.
Nurse Author Ed. 2003 Spring;13(2):7-9.
9
Who is responsible for investigating suspected research misconduct?
Anaesthesia. 2012 May;67(5):462-466. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07132.x. Epub 2012 Mar 8.
10
The role of the media in the Stoke CNEP saga.
J R Soc Med. 2010 May;103(5):173-7. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2010.10k011. Epub 2010 Apr 20.
引用本文的文献
1
Scientific integrity issues in Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry: Improving research reproducibility, credibility, and transparency.
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2019 May;15(3):320-344. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4119. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
2
Tackling treatment uncertainties together: the evolution of the James Lind Initiative, 2003-2013.
J R Soc Med. 2013 Dec;106(12):482-91. doi: 10.1177/0141076813493063. Epub 2013 Jul 3.
3
Whistleblowing and patient safety: the patient's or the profession's interests at stake?
J R Soc Med. 2011 Jul;104(7):278-82. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2011.110034.
4
'Mis-investigating alleged research misconduct can have dire consequences' and 'Regulating research, regulating professionals'.
J R Soc Med. 2010 Jun;103(6):213; author reply 213-4. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2010.10k021.
5
The Stoke CNEP Saga - how it damaged all involved.
J R Soc Med. 2010 Jul;103(7):277-82. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2010.10k012. Epub 2010 Apr 20.
6
The role of the media in the Stoke CNEP saga.
J R Soc Med. 2010 May;103(5):173-7. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2010.10k011. Epub 2010 Apr 20.
7
Regulating research, regulating professionals.
J R Soc Med. 2010 Apr;103(4):125-6. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2010.10k013.
本文引用的文献
1
The UK Panel of Research Integrity: a missed opportunity.
Lancet. 2008 Oct 25;372(9648):1438. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61602-5.
2
Collapse of GMC hearing into research misconduct.
Lancet. 2008 Oct 11;372(9646):1283-4. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61532-9.
3
Three doctors and a GMC prosecution.
BMJ. 2008 Jul 24;337:a907. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a907.
4
The 1996 Continuous Negative Extrathoracic Pressure (CNEP) trial: were parents' allegations of research fraud fraudulent?
Pediatrics. 2006 Jun;117(6):2244-6. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-0819.
5
CNEP and research governance.
Lancet. 2006 Apr 1;367(9516):1037-1038. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68448-1.
6
Are any of the criticisms of the CNEP trial true?
Lancet. 2006 Apr 1;367(9516):1032-1033. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68445-6.
7
Research governance: panacea or problem?
Clin Med (Lond). 2005 May-Jun;5(3):235-9. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.5-3-235.
8
Abuse of people trying to protect children from abuse.
Lancet. 2001 Nov 24;358(9295):1820. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06834-9.
9
Open letter to the chief medical officer.
BMJ. 2001 Aug 4;323(7307):280. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7307.280.
10
Investigating allegations of research misconduct: the vital need for due process.
BMJ. 2000 Sep 23;321(7263):752-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7263.752.
Zotero 插件