相似文献
1
The Stoke CNEP Saga - how it damaged all involved.
J R Soc Med. 2010 Jul;103(7):277-82. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2010.10k012. Epub 2010 Apr 20.
2
The Stoke CNEP saga--a view from the General Medical Council.
J R Soc Med. 2010 Aug 1;103(8):313-6. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2009.09k076. Epub 2010 Apr 20.
3
The Stoke CNEP saga - did it need to take so long?
J R Soc Med. 2010 Sep;103(9):352-6. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2010.10k010. Epub 2010 Apr 20.
4
The CNEP trial: how a good trial was turned rotten.
J R Soc Med. 2010 Apr;103(4):121-2. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2010.10k018.
5
The Stoke CNEP Saga - the Government enquiry in retrospect.
J R Soc Med. 2010 Jun;103(6):226-30. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2009.09k075. Epub 2010 Apr 20.
6
Regulating research, regulating professionals.
J R Soc Med. 2010 Apr;103(4):125-6. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2010.10k013.
7
The role of the media in the Stoke CNEP saga.
J R Soc Med. 2010 May;103(5):173-7. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2010.10k011. Epub 2010 Apr 20.
8
Babies and consent: yet another NHS scandal. But it should lead to improvements in research governance within the NHS.
BMJ. 2000 May 13;320(7245):1285-6.
9
Headache doctor found guilty of dishonesty in research misconduct case.
BMJ. 2015 Feb 6;350:h709. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h709.
10
Are any of the criticisms of the CNEP trial true?
Lancet. 2006 Apr 1;367(9516):1032-1033. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68445-6.
引用本文的文献
1
Whistleblowing and patient safety: the patient's or the profession's interests at stake?
J R Soc Med. 2011 Jul;104(7):278-82. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2011.110034.
本文引用的文献
1
The role of the media in the Stoke CNEP saga.
J R Soc Med. 2010 May;103(5):173-7. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2010.10k011. Epub 2010 Apr 20.
2
Mis-investigating alleged research misconduct can cause widespread, unpredictable damage.
J R Soc Med. 2010 Apr;103(4):133-8. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2010.09k045.
3
Pharyngeal pressure value using two continuous positive airway pressure devices.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2008 Jul;93(4):F302-4. doi: 10.1136/adc.2007.120428. Epub 2008 Mar 11.
4
Improving the quality of consent to randomised controlled trials by using continuous consent and clinician training in the consent process.
J Med Ethics. 2006 Aug;32(8):439-43. doi: 10.1136/jme.2005.013722.
5
The 1996 Continuous Negative Extrathoracic Pressure (CNEP) trial: were parents' allegations of research fraud fraudulent?
Pediatrics. 2006 Jun;117(6):2244-6. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-0819.
6
CNEP and research governance.
Lancet. 2006 Apr 1;367(9516):1037-1038. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68448-1.
7
Respiratory support of infants with bronchiolitis related apnoea: is there a role for negative pressure?
Arch Dis Child. 2005 Mar;90(3):224-5. doi: 10.1136/adc.2004.054007.
8
Neonatal research: the parental perspective.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2004 Jul;89(4):F321-3. doi: 10.1136/adc.2002.021931.
9
Learning from the sad, sorry saga at Stoke.
Arch Dis Child. 2002 Jan;86(1):1-3. doi: 10.1136/adc.86.1.1.
10
GMC must recognise and deal with vexatious complaints fast.
BMJ. 2002 Jan 19;324(7330):167-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7330.167a.
Zotero 插件