Martínez-Crego Begoña, Alcoverro Teresa, Romero Javier
Centro de Estudios Avanzados de Blanes, C/Acceso a la Cala St Francesc 14, 17300, Blanes, Girona, Spain.
J Environ Monit. 2010 May;12(5):1013-28. doi: 10.1039/b920937a. Epub 2010 Apr 9.
Biotic indices have become key assessment tools in most recent national and trans-national policies aimed at improving the quality of coastal waters and the integrity of their associated ecosystems. In this study we analyzed 90 published biotic indices, classified them into four types, and analyzed the strengths and weaknesses of each type in relation to the requirements of these policies. We identified three main type-specific weaknesses. First, the problems of applicability, due to practical and conceptual difficulties, which affect most indices related to ecosystem function. Second, the failure of many indices based on structural attributes of the community (e.g. taxonomic composition) to link deterioration with causative stressors, or to provide an early-detection capacity. Third, the poor relevance to the ecological integrity of indices based on attributes at the sub-individual level (e.g. multi-biomarkers). Additionally, most indices still fail on two further aspects: the broad-scale applicability and the definition of reference conditions. Nowadays, the most promising approach seems to be the aggregation of indices with complementary strengths, and obtained from different biological communities.
生物指数已成为近期旨在提高沿海水域质量及其相关生态系统完整性的大多数国家和跨国政策中的关键评估工具。在本研究中,我们分析了90种已发表的生物指数,将它们分为四种类型,并针对这些政策的要求分析了每种类型的优缺点。我们确定了三种主要的类型特定弱点。第一,由于实际和概念上的困难导致的适用性问题,这影响了大多数与生态系统功能相关的指数。第二,许多基于群落结构属性(如分类组成)的指数未能将退化与致病压力源联系起来,或提供早期检测能力。第三,基于个体以下水平属性(如多种生物标志物)的指数与生态完整性的相关性较差。此外,大多数指数在另外两个方面仍然存在不足:广泛的适用性和参考条件的定义。如今,最有前景的方法似乎是将具有互补优势且来自不同生物群落的指数进行汇总。