• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单人手术的活体供肾切取术的可行性:使用视频辅助小切口手术的初步经验。

The feasibility of solo-surgeon living donor nephrectomy: initial experience using video-assisted minilaparotomy surgery.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 134, Shinchon-dong, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 120-752, Korea.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2010 Nov;24(11):2755-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1040-z. Epub 2010 Apr 10.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-010-1040-z
PMID:20383533
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Today, many kinds of surgery are being conducted without human assistants. Living donor nephrectomy (LDN) using video-assisted minilaparotomy surgery (VAM) has been performed by solo-surgeon using Unitrac® (Aesculap Surgical Instrument, Germany). We examined the results from VAM-solo-surgeon living donor nephrectomy (SLDN) and conventional VAM-human-assisted living donor nephrectomy (HLDN).

METHODS

Between July 2007 and April 2008, 82 cases of VAM-LDN were performed by two surgeons. From these cases, we randomly assigned 35 cases to undergo solo-surgery (group I) and the other 47 cases to undergo surgery with one human assistant (group II). All VAM-LDN procedures were performed in the same manner. Only the roles of a first assistant were substituted by the Unitrac® in group I. We compared the perioperative and postoperative data, including operative time, estimated blood loss, and hospital stay, between the two groups. We also investigated cases that developed complications.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the patient demographic data between the two groups (P > 0.05). The mean operative time was 201.9 ± 32.9 min in group I and 202.4 ± 48.3 min in group II (P = 0.954), whereas mean blood loss was 209.7 ± 167.3 ml in group I and 179.6 ± 87.8 ml in group II (P = 0.294). Postoperative hospital stay were 5.4 ± 1.1 days in group I and 5.5 ± 1.6 days in group II (P = 0.813). The incidence of perioperative complications was not significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that VAM-SLDN can be performed safely, is economically beneficial, and is comparable to VAM-HLDN in terms of postoperative outcomes.

摘要

背景

如今,许多手术都无需人类助手即可进行。使用视频辅助小切口手术(VAM)的活体供肾切除术(LDN)已由单独的外科医生使用 Unitrac®(德国 Aesculap 外科器械公司)进行。我们检查了 VAM-单人手术活体供肾切除术(SLDN)和传统 VAM-人类辅助活体供肾切除术(HLDN)的结果。

方法

在 2007 年 7 月至 2008 年 4 月期间,两位外科医生进行了 82 例 VAM-LDN。从这些病例中,我们随机将 35 例分配为单人手术组(I 组),其余 47 例分配为有一名人类助手的手术组(II 组)。所有 VAM-LDN 手术均以相同的方式进行。只有第一助手的角色在 I 组中被 Unitrac®替代。我们比较了两组患者的围手术期和术后数据,包括手术时间、估计失血量和住院时间。我们还调查了发生并发症的病例。

结果

两组患者的人口统计学数据无显著差异(P>0.05)。I 组的平均手术时间为 201.9±32.9 分钟,II 组为 202.4±48.3 分钟(P=0.954),而 I 组的平均失血量为 209.7±167.3 毫升,II 组为 179.6±87.8 毫升(P=0.294)。I 组的术后住院时间为 5.4±1.1 天,II 组为 5.5±1.6 天(P=0.813)。两组围手术期并发症发生率无显著差异。

结论

我们的研究表明,VAM-SLDN 可以安全进行,在经济上有利,并且在术后结果方面与 VAM-HLDN 相当。

相似文献

1
The feasibility of solo-surgeon living donor nephrectomy: initial experience using video-assisted minilaparotomy surgery.单人手术的活体供肾切取术的可行性:使用视频辅助小切口手术的初步经验。
Surg Endosc. 2010 Nov;24(11):2755-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1040-z. Epub 2010 Apr 10.
2
Favorable outcomes among recipients of living-donor nephrectomy using video-assisted minilaparotomy.采用电视辅助小切口进行活体供肾肾切除术受者的良好预后。
Transplantation. 2004 Jun 15;77(11):1725-8. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000129411.49661.1c.
3
The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy for renal transplantation: an updated meta-analysis.腹腔镜供体肾切除术用于肾移植的安全性和有效性:一项更新的荟萃分析。
Transplant Proc. 2013 Jan-Feb;45(1):65-76. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.07.152.
4
Comparison of laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) and conventional laparoscopic donor nephrectomy at a single institution.单中心腹腔镜下单部位手术(LESS)与传统腹腔镜供肾切术的比较。
BJU Int. 2013 Jul;112(2):198-206. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11763.x. Epub 2013 Mar 11.
5
Reproducibility and Step-By-Step Learning Curve of Retroperitoneal Video-Assisted Mini-Laparotomy Surgery for Living Donor Nephrectomy: A Single-Center Experience.后腹腔镜辅助小切口活体供肾切取术的可重复性和分步学习曲线:单中心经验。
Exp Clin Transplant. 2022 Jul;20(7):657-662. doi: 10.6002/ect.2022.0086.
6
Learning curves of minimally invasive donor nephrectomy in a high-volume center: A cohort study of 1895 consecutive living donors.高容量中心微创供体肾切除术的学习曲线:对1895例连续活体供体的队列研究
Int J Surg. 2021 Feb;86:7-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.12.011. Epub 2021 Jan 9.
7
A comparison of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus conventional procedures for laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a Japanese multi-institutional retrospective study.腹腔镜单部位手术与传统腹腔镜供肾切除术的比较:日本多机构回顾性研究。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Aug;34(8):3424-3434. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07119-9. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
8
Cumulative sum analysis of the learning curve for video-assisted minilaparotomy donor nephrectomy in healthy kidney donors.健康肾脏供体中视频辅助小切口供肾切除术学习曲线的累积和分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Apr;97(17):e0560. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010560.
9
Can right-sided hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy be advocated above standard laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a randomized pilot study.右侧手辅助后腹腔镜供肾切除术是否比标准腹腔镜供肾切除术更具优势:一项随机试点研究。
Transpl Int. 2014 Feb;27(2):162-9. doi: 10.1111/tri.12226. Epub 2013 Nov 25.
10
Successful introduction of laparoendoscopic single-site donor nephrectomy after experience with laparoscopic single-site plus-one trocar donor nephrectomy.在经历了腹腔镜单孔加一针Trocar供肾切除术之后,成功引入了腹腔镜单孔供肾切除术。
J Endourol. 2015 Apr;29(4):435-42. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0509. Epub 2014 Nov 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Solo-surgeon pure laparoscopic donor nephrectomy using passive camera holder: IDEAL stage 2a study.单人腹腔镜供肾切取术采用被动式摄像臂:理想阶段 2a 研究。
BMC Urol. 2022 Mar 25;22(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12894-022-00996-8.
2
Comparison of Short-term Outcomes of Laparoscopic-Assisted Colon Cancer Surgery Using a Joystick-Guided Endoscope Holder (Soloassist II) or a Human Assistant.使用操纵杆引导式内镜固定器(Soloassist II)或人工助手进行腹腔镜辅助结肠癌手术的短期结果比较。
Ann Coloproctol. 2019 Aug;35(4):181-186. doi: 10.3393/ac.2018.10.18. Epub 2019 Aug 31.
3
Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with a joystick-guided robotic scope holder (Soloassist II®): retrospective comparative study with human assistant.

本文引用的文献

1
Laparoscopic Nissen solo surgery using PMAT (first experience).使用PMAT的腹腔镜尼森单手术(首次经验)。
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2007;16(6):347-9. doi: 10.1080/13645700701699323.
2
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy as solo surgery with the aid of a robotic camera holder: a case-control study.借助机器人摄像头固定器进行的腹腔镜胆囊切除术单手术操作:一项病例对照研究。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2007 Aug;17(4):277-82. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31806030ae.
3
A novel endoscope manipulator, Naviot, enables solo-surgery to be performed during video-assisted thoracic surgery.
棒状控制器引导的机器人腔镜持镜架(Soloassist II®)在腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中的应用:与人体助手对照的回顾性研究
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2019 Jun;404(4):495-503. doi: 10.1007/s00423-019-01793-y. Epub 2019 May 25.
4
Comparative effectiveness of human scope assistant versus robotic scope holder in laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer.人镜辅助与机械臂镜持器在结直肠腹腔镜切除术中的比较效果。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Jul;33(7):2206-2216. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6506-4. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
5
Cumulative sum analysis of the learning curve for video-assisted minilaparotomy donor nephrectomy in healthy kidney donors.健康肾脏供体中视频辅助小切口供肾切除术学习曲线的累积和分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Apr;97(17):e0560. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010560.
6
Feasibility and Usefulness of a Joystick-Guided Robotic Scope Holder (Soloassist) in Laparoscopic Surgery.操纵杆引导的机器人手术镜头固定器(Soloassist)在腹腔镜手术中的可行性和实用性
Visc Med. 2018 Feb;34(1):37-44. doi: 10.1159/000485524. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
7
Risk Factors Associated with Decreased Renal Function after Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy: A Multivariate Analysis of a Single Surgeon Experience.手辅助腹腔镜供肾切除术术后肾功能下降的相关危险因素:单中心外科医生经验的多因素分析
Int J Med Sci. 2017 Feb 8;14(2):159-166. doi: 10.7150/ijms.17585. eCollection 2017.
8
Technical and instrumental prerequisites for single-port laparoscopic solo surgery: state of art.单孔腹腔镜单人手术的技术和器械前提条件:现状
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Apr 21;21(15):4440-6. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i15.4440.
一种新型的内窥镜操纵器Naviot,能够在电视辅助胸腔手术中进行单人手术。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2005 Oct;4(5):404-5. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2005.108282. Epub 2005 Jun 22.
4
Cost effectiveness of laparoscopic versus mini-incision open donor nephrectomy: a randomized study.腹腔镜与小切口开放性供体肾切除术的成本效益:一项随机研究。
Transplantation. 2007 Jun 27;83(12):1582-7. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000267149.64831.08.
5
A camera handler for Miccoli's minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy and paratiroidectomy procedures.一种用于米科利微创视频辅助甲状腺切除术和甲状旁腺切除术的摄像操控器。
Surg Endosc. 2007 Jun;21(6):1017-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-006-9088-5. Epub 2006 Dec 16.
6
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy using a newly developed laparoscope manipulator for 10 patients with cholelithiasis.使用新开发的腹腔镜操纵器对10例胆结石患者进行腹腔镜胆囊切除术。
Surg Endosc. 2006 May;20(5):753-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-005-0177-7. Epub 2005 Dec 6.
7
Experimental assessment of a new mechanical endoscopic solosurgery system: Endofreeze.一种新型机械内镜单人手术系统:Endofreeze的实验评估
Surg Endosc. 2005 Apr;19(4):581-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-9132-7. Epub 2005 Mar 11.
8
Video assisted minilaparotomy surgery (VAMS)--live donor nephrectomy: 239 cases.视频辅助小切口腹腔镜手术(VAMS)——活体供肾肾切除术:239例。
Yonsei Med J. 2004 Dec 31;45(6):1149-54. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2004.45.6.1149.
9
Camera and instrument holders and their clinical value in minimally invasive surgery.摄像头及器械固定装置及其在微创手术中的临床价值。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2004 Jun;14(3):145-52. doi: 10.1097/01.sle.0000129395.42501.5d.
10
Use of a robotic system as surgical first assistant in advanced laparoscopic surgery.在高级腹腔镜手术中使用机器人系统作为手术第一助手。
J Am Coll Surg. 2004 Sep;199(3):368-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.05.257.