Suppr超能文献

推理大鼠还是联想动物?对累加和亚累加预训练对阻断效应的共同要素分析。

Reasoning rats or associative animals? A common-element analysis of the effects of additive and subadditive pretraining on blocking.

作者信息

Haselgrove Mark

机构信息

School of Psychology, The University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD England.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2010 Apr;36(2):296-306. doi: 10.1037/a0016603.

Abstract

Beckers, Miller, De Houwer, and Urushihara (2006) described the results of 3 blocking experiments conducted with rats. Beckers et al. concluded that the results of these experiments cannot be accounted for with existing theories of associative learning, and argued, instead, that the results were a consequence of the rats engaging in a process akin to effortful reasoning. Simulations of the Rescorla and Wagner (1972) theory of learning presented here challenge this conclusion by providing an alternative, associative, explanation for the results presented by Beckers et al.

摘要

贝克斯、米勒、德霍弗和乌鲁希哈拉(2006年)描述了对大鼠进行的3次阻断实验的结果。贝克斯等人得出结论,这些实验的结果无法用现有的联想学习理论来解释,相反,他们认为这些结果是大鼠进行类似于费力推理过程的结果。此处呈现的雷斯克拉和瓦格纳(1972年)学习理论的模拟通过为贝克斯等人呈现的结果提供另一种联想性解释,对这一结论提出了挑战。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验