Department of Psychology, Brooklyn College, City University of New York.
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2022 Apr;48(2):75-85. doi: 10.1037/xan0000265.
In summation experiments, responding to a compound stimulus is assessed after conditioning a response to each of its components. This simple experiment poses significant challenges to models of associative learning because of substantial variability in results. Here, I introduce a new method to quantify generalization from components to compound in summation experiments, which I apply to over 250 measurements of summation in rabbits, pigeons, rats, and humans. The analysis confirms that more summation occurs with stimuli from different rather than from the same sensory modality, although this is not the sole determinant of summation. A theoretical analysis shows that this finding is best accounted for by a model that includes both element sharing (Rescorla & Wagner, 1972) and element replacement (Brandon et al., 2000) in stimulus representations. I point out remaining gaps in our empirical and theoretical understanding of summation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
在总结实验中,对每个成分进行条件反射后,评估对复合刺激的反应。由于结果存在很大的可变性,这种简单的实验对联想学习模型提出了重大挑战。在这里,我引入了一种新的方法来量化总和实验中从成分到复合的泛化,我将其应用于超过 250 个兔子、鸽子、老鼠和人类总和的测量。分析证实,与来自不同而不是相同感觉模式的刺激相比,会发生更多的总和,尽管这不是总和的唯一决定因素。理论分析表明,这一发现最好用一个包括刺激表示中的元素共享(Rescorla 和 Wagner,1972)和元素替换(Brandon 等人,2000)的模型来解释。我指出了我们对总和的经验和理论理解中仍然存在的差距。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2022 APA,保留所有权利)。