Department of Anesthesiology, UCSD Center for Pain Medicine, 9300 Campus Point Dr., MC 7651, La Jolla, CA 92037-7651, USA.
Anesth Analg. 2010 Jun 1;110(6):1725-8. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181db7ad3. Epub 2010 Apr 12.
BACKGROUND: All widely used psoas compartment block/catheter techniques have a common limitation: external landmarks do not accurately predict lumbar plexus depth, leaving practitioners to "guess" at what depth to stop advancing the placement needle when neither transverse process nor lumbar plexus is intercepted. We assessed the accuracy of ultrasound in estimating transverse process depth before needle insertion and prediction of actual needle-to-plexus intercept depth for psoas compartment nerve blocks and perineural catheter insertion. METHODS: Before needle insertion, ultrasound was used to estimate the depth of the transverse process lying directly anterior to the intercrestal line. If a transverse process was not directly anterior to the intercrestal line, then the process immediately caudad to the line was imaged. The ultrasound transducer remained in the parasagittal plane, perpendicular to the skin. After this measurement, the transducer was removed, an insulated needle connected to a nerve stimulator inserted in the parasagittal plane, and the depth of both the transverse process (if contacted) and lumbar plexus noted. A perineural catheter was subsequently inserted. RESULTS: Of 53 enrolled subjects, in 50 cases (94%), the transverse processes were identified by ultrasound at a median (interquartile; range) depth of 5.0 cm (4.5-5.5 cm; 3.5-7.5 cm). In 27 subjects (54%), a transverse process was positioned directly anterior to the intercrestal line, and in all of these subjects, the transverse process was intercepted with the block needle a median of 0.5 cm (0.0-1.0 cm; 0.0-1.0 cm) within the predicted depth. In all 50 subjects in whom the transverse processes were identified by ultrasound, the actual lumbar plexus depth measured with the needle was a median of 7.5 cm (7.0-8.5 cm; 5.0-9.5 cm), and the plexus depth was a median of 2.5 cm (2.0-3.0 cm; 0.2-4.0 cm) past the estimated transverse process depth by ultrasound. By ultrasound, the intersection of the middle and lateral thirds of the intercrestal line between the midline and a parallel line through the posterosuperior iliac spine was too lateral to permit needle-transverse process contact in 50% of the subjects. However, moving the transducer 0.75 cm toward the midline allowed for transverse process imaging in all subjects. CONCLUSIONS: For psoas compartment blocks/catheters, prepuncture ultrasound imaging accurately predicts transverse process depth to within 1 cm, and if the lumbar plexus is estimated to be within 3 cm of the transverse process, ultrasound allows prediction of maximal lumbar plexus depth to within 1 cm.
背景:所有广泛使用的腰大肌间隙阻滞/导管技术都有一个共同的局限性:外部标志不能准确预测腰丛的深度,这使得操作者在没有横突或腰丛被拦截的情况下,只能“猜测”在什么深度停止推进置管针。我们评估了超声在预测腰大肌间隙神经阻滞和外周神经导管插入时进针前横突深度以及实际针至神经丛拦截深度的准确性。
方法:在进针前,超声用于估计位于椎间线正前方的横突深度。如果横突不在椎间线正前方,则对位于该线下方的横突进行成像。超声换能器保持在矢状平面上,垂直于皮肤。测量后,将换能器移开,将连接神经刺激器的绝缘针插入矢状平面,并记录横突(如果接触到)和腰丛的深度。随后插入外周神经导管。
结果:在 53 名入组受试者中,在 50 例(94%)中,超声可在中位数(四分位数;范围)5.0 cm(4.5-5.5 cm;3.5-7.5 cm)处识别出横突。在 27 名受试者(54%)中,横突位于椎间线正前方,在所有这些受试者中,阻滞针插入的横突的位置均在预测深度内中位数 0.5 cm(0.0-1.0 cm;0.0-1.0 cm)处。在所有 50 名超声可识别横突的受试者中,实际用针测量的腰丛深度中位数为 7.5 cm(7.0-8.5 cm;5.0-9.5 cm),腰丛深度中位数为 2.5 cm(2.0-3.0 cm;0.2-4.0 cm)超出超声估计的横突深度。通过超声,在中线和通过后上髂棘的平行线之间的椎间线中间和外侧三分之一的交点太偏外侧,以至于在 50%的受试者中无法使针与横突接触。然而,将换能器向中线移动 0.75 cm,可使所有受试者的横突成像。
结论:对于腰大肌间隙阻滞/导管,术前超声成像可准确预测横突深度,误差在 1 cm 以内,如果估计腰丛位于横突 3 cm 以内,则超声可预测腰丛最大深度,误差在 1 cm 以内。
Vet Anaesth Analg. 2016-7
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2004
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2011-9
J Med Ultrasound. 2021-7-2
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2020-10
J Spine Surg. 2018-6
Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2012
Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2011
Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2011