Arif Hiba, Buchsbaum Richard, Pierro Joanna, Whalen Michael, Sims Jessica, Resor Stanley R, Bazil Carl W, Hirsch Lawrence J
Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, Columbia University, Neurological Institute, 710 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Arch Neurol. 2010 Apr;67(4):408-15. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2010.49.
To compare the effectiveness of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) for use in older adults with epilepsy.
Retrospective review.
Columbia Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, New York, New York.
Four hundred seventeen outpatients 55 years and older newly taking any of the 10 most commonly prescribed AEDs between 2000 and 2005.
The percentage of patients who remained taking the AED for 12 or more months (12-month "retention"). We also measured efficacy (12-month seizure freedom) and adverse effects leading to dose change. Retention and seizure-freedom rates were analyzed by pairwise comparisons using chi(2) for the overall group and patients with refractory and nonrefractory disease as well as patients newly taking their first AED.
The 10 AEDs newly taken by 10 or more patients were analyzed. There were no significant non-AED predictors of retention. Without controlling for severity, lamotrigine had the highest 12-month retention rate (79%), significantly higher than carbamazepine (48%), gabapentin (59%), oxcarbazepine (24%), phenytoin (59%), and topiramate (56%). The retention rate for levetiracetam (73%) was second highest and significantly higher than carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine. Oxcarbazepine had the lowest retention rate, significantly lower than all other AEDs. Lamotrigine had the highest 12-month seizure-freedom rate (54%), followed by levetiracetam (43%). When stratified into patients with nonrefractory and refractory disease, relative rates of seizure freedom and retention remained comparable with the overall group. Imbalance, drowsiness, and gastrointestinal symptoms were the most common intolerable adverse effects.
In this study of older adults with epilepsy, lamotrigine was the most effective AED as measured by 12-month retention and seizure freedom, with levetiracetam a close second. Oxcarbazepine was consistently less effective than most other AEDs.
比较抗癫痫药物(AEDs)用于老年癫痫患者的有效性。
回顾性研究。
纽约哥伦比亚综合癫痫中心。
2000年至2005年间新服用10种最常用AEDs中任何一种的417名55岁及以上门诊患者。
持续服用AED达12个月或更长时间(12个月“保留率”)的患者百分比。我们还测量了疗效(12个月无癫痫发作)和导致剂量改变的不良反应。采用卡方检验进行两两比较,分析总体人群、难治性和非难治性疾病患者以及新服用第一种AED的患者的保留率和无癫痫发作率。
对10名或更多患者新服用的10种AEDs进行了分析。没有显著的非AED因素可预测保留率。在未控制病情严重程度的情况下,拉莫三嗪的12个月保留率最高(79%),显著高于卡马西平(48%)、加巴喷丁(59%)、奥卡西平(24%)、苯妥英(59%)和托吡酯(56%)。左乙拉西坦的保留率(73%)排第二,显著高于卡马西平和奥卡西平。奥卡西平的保留率最低,显著低于所有其他AEDs。拉莫三嗪的12个月无癫痫发作率最高(54%),其次是左乙拉西坦(43%)。当分为非难治性和难治性疾病患者时,无癫痫发作率和保留率的相对比例与总体人群相当。失衡、嗜睡和胃肠道症状是最常见的难以耐受的不良反应。
在这项针对老年癫痫患者的研究中,以12个月保留率和无癫痫发作衡量,拉莫三嗪是最有效的AED,左乙拉西坦紧随其后。奥卡西平始终比大多数其他AEDs效果差。