Kertesz Andrew, Jesso Sarah, Harciarek Michal, Blair Mervin, McMonagle Paul
Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, University of Western Ontario, 268 Grosvenor St, London, ON N6A 4V2.
Arch Neurol. 2010 Apr;67(4):483-9. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2010.55.
To describe a large, clinically defined cohort of patients with semantic dementia (SD) that highlights important, sometimes overlooked features and to compare it with similar entities.
Cohort study.
A cognitive neurology clinic.
A population of 48 patients clinically diagnosed with SD was contrasted with 52 patients with progressive nonfluent aphasia, 42 patients with a behavioral variety of frontotemporal dementia, and 105 patients with Alzheimer disease on speech output characteristics, comprehension, naming, and repetition subtests of the Western Aphasia Battery, the Frontal Behavioral Inventory, and other cognitive tests. Neuroimaging was visually analyzed, and 6 patients with SD had autopsy.
Of 37 patients with probable SD, 48.6% had semantic jargon; 21.6%, excessive garrulous output; and 75.7%, some pragmatic disturbance. Semantic substitutions were frequent in SD (54.1%) but phonological errors were absent, in contrast to progressive nonfluent aphasia with the opposite pattern. All but 3 patients with probable SD questioned the meaning of words. Patients with SD had significantly lower naming and comprehension scores, and their fluency was between progressive nonfluent aphasia and Alzheimer disease or behavioral frontotemporal dementia. Behavior was abnormal in 94.6% of patients with probable SD.
Semantic dementia is distinguishable from other presentations of frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer disease, not only by fluent speech and impaired comprehension without loss of episodic memory, syntax, and phonology but also by empty, garrulous speech with thematic perseverations, semantic paraphasias, and poor category fluency. Questioning the meaning of words (eg, "What is steak?") is an important diagnostic clue not seen in other groups, and behavior change is prevalent.
描述一个临床上明确界定的语义性痴呆(SD)患者队列,突出重要的、有时被忽视的特征,并将其与类似病症进行比较。
队列研究。
认知神经科门诊。
48例临床诊断为SD的患者与52例进行性非流畅性失语患者、42例行为变异型额颞叶痴呆患者以及105例阿尔茨海默病患者,在西方失语成套测验的言语输出特征、理解、命名和复述分测验、额叶行为量表及其他认知测验方面进行对比。对神经影像学检查结果进行视觉分析,6例SD患者接受了尸检。
在37例可能患有SD的患者中,48.6%存在语义性行话;21.6%言语过多;75.7%存在一些语用障碍。与进行性非流畅性失语相反,SD患者中语义替代频繁(54.1%)但无语音错误。除3例可能患有SD的患者外,其余患者均对词汇的意义表示疑问。SD患者的命名和理解得分显著较低,其流畅性介于进行性非流畅性失语与阿尔茨海默病或行为变异型额颞叶痴呆之间。94.6%可能患有SD的患者存在行为异常。
语义性痴呆不仅可通过流畅言语、理解受损但情景记忆、句法和语音未丧失,还可通过空洞、冗长且有主题重复、语义性错语和类别流畅性差的言语与其他额颞叶痴呆和阿尔茨海默病表现相区分。对词汇意义表示疑问(如“牛排是什么?”)是其他组未出现的重要诊断线索,且行为改变很常见。