Suppr超能文献

不同举重节奏对深蹲运动中地面反作用力的影响。

Effects of different lifting cadences on ground reaction forces during the squat exercise.

机构信息

Wyle Integrated Science and Engineering Group, Houston, Texas, USA.

出版信息

J Strength Cond Res. 2010 May;24(5):1414-20. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181cb27e7.

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to determine the effect of different lifting cadences on the ground reaction force (GRF) during the squat exercise. Squats performed with greater acceleration will produce greater inertial forces; however, it is not well understood how different squat cadences affect GRF. The hypotheses were that faster squat cadences would result in greater peak GRF and that the contributions of the body and barbell, both of equivalent mass, to total system inertial force would not be different. Six experienced male subjects (31 +/- 4 years, 180 +/- 9 cm, 88.8 +/- 13.3 kg) performed 3 sets of 3 squats using 3 different cadences (fast cadence [FC] = 1-second descent/1-second ascent; medium cadence [MC] = 3-second descent/1-second ascent; and slow cadence [SC] = 4-second descent/2-second ascent) while lifting a barbell mass equal to their body mass. Ground reaction force and velocity sensor data were used to calculate inertial force contributions of both the body and barbell to total inertial force. Peak GRF were significantly higher in FC squats compared to MC (p = 0.0002) and SC (p = 0.0002). Ranges of GRF were also significantly higher in FC compared to MC (p < 0.05) and higher in MC compared to SC (p < 0.05). The inertial forces associated with the body were larger than those associated with the barbell, regardless of cadence. Faster squat cadences result in significantly greater peak GRF as a result of the inertia of the system. This study demonstrates that GRF was more dependent on descent cadence than on ascent cadence and that researchers should not use a single point on the body to approximate the location of the center of mass during squat exercise analysis.

摘要

本研究旨在确定不同举重节奏对深蹲运动中地面反作用力(GRF)的影响。加速度较大的深蹲会产生更大的惯性力;然而,不同深蹲节奏如何影响 GRF 尚不清楚。研究假设是更快的深蹲节奏会导致更大的峰值 GRF,并且具有相同质量的身体和杠铃对总系统惯性力的贡献不会不同。6 名经验丰富的男性受试者(31 ± 4 岁,180 ± 9 cm,88.8 ± 13.3 kg)使用 3 种不同的节奏(快节奏 [FC] = 1 秒下降/1 秒上升;中节奏 [MC] = 3 秒下降/1 秒上升;慢节奏 [SC] = 4 秒下降/2 秒上升)完成 3 组 3 次深蹲,同时举起与体重相等的杠铃。使用地面反作用力和速度传感器数据计算身体和杠铃对总惯性力的惯性力贡献。FC 深蹲的峰值 GRF 明显高于 MC(p = 0.0002)和 SC(p = 0.0002)。FC 深蹲的 GRF 范围也明显高于 MC(p < 0.05),高于 MC 与 SC(p < 0.05)。无论节奏如何,与杠铃相比,身体的惯性力都更大。更快的深蹲节奏会导致系统的惯性力更大,从而导致更大的峰值 GRF。本研究表明,GRF 更依赖于下降节奏,而不是上升节奏,研究人员在进行深蹲运动分析时不应该使用身体上的单点来近似质心的位置。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验