Suppr超能文献

印第安人地区的 CBPR:紧张局势及其对健康传播的影响。

CBPR in Indian country: tensions and implications for health communication.

机构信息

ER Murrow College of Communication, Washington State University.

出版信息

Health Commun. 2010 Jan;25(1):50-60. doi: 10.1080/10410230903473524.

Abstract

There is a common perspective among public health researchers and community members that although health promotion or disease prevention practices, programs, and projects should be done with rather than to individuals and communities, for various practical, economic, political, and cultural reasons, this is easier said than done. This study examines community-based participatory research (CBPR) in a university-based research center conducting health promotion and disease prevention research in Indian Country. This article reviews the tensions between CBPR ideologies, its practical application in Indian Country, and the impact of this theory/practice dialectic on the ability to conduct health promotion and disease prevention research. It concludes that far from empowering individuals and communities, status quo research in Indian Country perpetuates a type of "clientism" that reinforces researcher/researched relationships.

摘要

公共卫生研究人员和社区成员普遍认为,尽管健康促进或疾病预防实践、项目和计划应该是针对个人和社区的,但由于各种实际、经济、政治和文化原因,说起来容易做起来难。本研究以一个大学研究中心为基础,考察了在印第安人保留地开展健康促进和疾病预防研究的社区参与式研究(CBPR)。本文回顾了 CBPR 理念、其在印第安人保留地的实际应用以及这一理论/实践辩证法对开展健康促进和疾病预防研究能力的影响之间的紧张关系。本文得出的结论是,在印第安人保留地,现状研究远没有赋予个人和社区权力,而是延续了一种“客户主义”,这种“客户主义”强化了研究人员与被研究人员之间的关系。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验