Southcity Family Medical Centre and University of Queensland Medical School, Queensland, Australia.
J Addict Dis. 2010 Jan;29(1):30-50. doi: 10.1080/10550880903435988.
Several reports express concern at the mortality associated with the use of oral naltrexone for opiate dependency. Registry controlled follow-up of patients treated with naltrexone implant and buprenorphine was performed. In the study, 255 naltrexone implant patients were followed for a mean (+/- standard deviation) of 5.22 +/- 1.87 years and 2,518 buprenorphine patients were followed for a mean (+/- standard deviation) of 3.19 +/- 1.61 years, accruing 1,332.22 and 8,030.02 patient-years of follow-up, respectively. The crude mortality rates were 3.00 and 5.35 per 1,000 patient-years, respectively, and the age standardized mortality rate ratio for naltrexone compared to buprenorphine was 0.676 (95% confidence interval = 0.014 to 1.338). Most sex, treatment group, and age comparisons significantly favored the naltrexone implant group. Mortality rates were shown to be comparable to, and intermediate between, published mortality rates of an age-standardized methadone treated cohort and the Australian population. These data suggest that the mortality rate from naltrexone implant is comparable to that of buprenorphine, methadone, and the Australian population.
有几份报告对使用口服纳曲酮治疗阿片类药物依赖相关的死亡率表示担忧。对接受纳曲酮植入物和丁丙诺啡治疗的患者进行了注册控制随访。在这项研究中,255 名纳曲酮植入物患者的平均随访时间为 5.22 +/- 1.87 年,2518 名丁丙诺啡患者的平均随访时间为 3.19 +/- 1.61 年,分别累积了 1332.22 和 8030.02 患者年的随访时间。粗死亡率分别为每 1000 患者年 3.00 和 5.35 例,纳曲酮与丁丙诺啡相比的年龄标准化死亡率比为 0.676(95%置信区间=0.014 至 1.338)。大多数性别、治疗组和年龄比较都明显倾向于纳曲酮植入物组。死亡率与已发表的年龄标准化美沙酮治疗队列和澳大利亚人群的死亡率相当,且处于两者之间。这些数据表明,纳曲酮植入物的死亡率与丁丙诺啡、美沙酮和澳大利亚人群相当。