Cases Viedma Enrique, Pérez Pallarés Javier, Martínez García Miguel Angel, López Reyes Raquel, Sanchís Moret Francisca, Sanchís Aldás José Luis
Hospital Universitario La Fe, Valencia, España.
Arch Bronconeumol. 2010 Jun;46(6):302-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arbres.2010.02.007. Epub 2010 Apr 13.
Flexible bronchoscopy (FB) is a procedure which is not usually tolerated well by the patient. This makes the examination more difficult, often needing repetition with the subsequent lowering of diagnostic performance.
The principal aim of our study is to analyse whether the use of a local anaesthetic with midazolam whilst performing an FB improves the quality of examination in terms of patient tolerance. Also of interest was to find out if this would improve the acceptance of a second or further FB, and the satisfaction of the bronchoscopist in performing these examinations.
A randomised, double blind and controlled with placebo, prospective study has been carried out to assess the use of midazolam. This included 152 patients, randomised into two groups: Group A-79 (51.9%) patients who received midazolam before the FB, and Group B-73 (49.1%) patients who received placebo. The patients were given a questionnaire about different aspects of perception of the procedure after the respiratory endoscopy and another was given to the bronchoscopist.
Both groups started off with a similar assessment of fear and nervousness. Group A gave a much higher score than Group B referring to variables related to symptoms and feeling. Patient cooperation assessed by the bronchoscopist was similar in both groups, although the length of the procedure and difficulty was higher in group B.
Our results show that patients sedated with midazolam tolerate FB better, remember less of the procedure itself and have a better predisposition to repeat the procedure. The bronchoscopist has less difficulties during the procedure and shortens the time using the same techniques during the bronchoscopy. The lack of severe complications and these results suggest the use of sedation with midazolam as routine during FB.
柔性支气管镜检查(FB)是一种患者通常耐受性不佳的操作。这使得检查更加困难,常常需要重复进行,进而导致诊断性能下降。
我们研究的主要目的是分析在进行FB时使用局部麻醉剂联合咪达唑仑是否能在患者耐受性方面提高检查质量。另外还想了解这是否会提高患者接受第二次或更多次FB的意愿,以及支气管镜检查医生对进行这些检查的满意度。
开展了一项随机、双盲且用安慰剂对照的前瞻性研究来评估咪达唑仑的使用情况。该研究纳入了152例患者,随机分为两组:A组79例(51.9%)患者在FB前接受咪达唑仑,B组73例(49.1%)患者接受安慰剂。在呼吸内镜检查后,向患者发放了一份关于该操作不同方面感受的问卷,并向支气管镜检查医生发放了另一份问卷。
两组在恐惧和紧张程度的初始评估上相似。在与症状和感受相关的变量方面,A组给出的评分远高于B组。支气管镜检查医生评估的患者合作程度在两组中相似,尽管B组的操作时间和难度更高。
我们的结果表明,用咪达唑仑镇静的患者对FB的耐受性更好,对操作过程的记忆更少,并且更愿意重复该操作。支气管镜检查医生在操作过程中遇到的困难更少,并且在使用相同技术进行支气管镜检查时缩短了时间。由于缺乏严重并发症以及这些结果,提示在FB期间将咪达唑仑镇静作为常规操作使用。