Dept of Thoracic Medicine, University College Hospital, London, UK.
Eur Respir Rev. 2013 Jun 1;22(128):106-16. doi: 10.1183/09059180.00006412.
Flexible bronchoscopy is commonly performed by respiratory physicians and is the gold standard for directly visualising the airways, allowing for numerous diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. With the widespread use of flexible bronchoscopy and the evolution of interventional bronchoscopy with more complex and longer procedures, physicians are placing increasing importance on the use of sedation as a necessary adjunct to topical anaesthesia. There is no standardised practice for the use of sedation in bronchoscopy with a good deal of variation among physicians regarding the use of pre-procedure medication and pharmacological sedatives. In addition, there is ongoing debate and controversy about proceduralist-administered versus anaesthetist-administered sedation whilst at the same time there is a growing body of evidence that nonanaesthetist administered sedation is safe and cost-effective. In this review we summarise the evidence for the use of sedation as an adjunct to topical anaesthesia in bronchoscopy and provide the clinician with up-to-date concise guidance for the use of pharmacological sedatives in bronchoscopy and future directions for sedation in the bronchoscopy suite.
纤维支气管镜检查通常由呼吸科医生进行,是直接观察气道的金标准,可进行多种诊断和治疗干预。随着纤维支气管镜检查的广泛应用和介入性支气管镜检查中越来越复杂和更长时间的操作的发展,医生越来越重视使用镇静作为局部麻醉的必要辅助手段。在支气管镜检查中使用镇静的标准做法并不统一,医生在使用术前用药和药理学镇静剂方面存在很大差异。此外,关于由介入医生还是麻醉医生给予镇静一直存在争议和争议,同时也有越来越多的证据表明非麻醉医生给予镇静是安全且具有成本效益的。在这篇综述中,我们总结了镇静作为局部麻醉辅助在支气管镜检查中的应用证据,并为临床医生提供了有关支气管镜检查中使用药理学镇静剂的最新简明指南,以及在支气管镜检查室中镇静的未来方向。