Ni Chroinin M, Greenstone I R, Ducharme F M
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18(2):CD005307. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005307.
Consensus statements recommend the addition of long-acting inhaled beta2-agonists only in asthmatic patients who are inadequately controlled on inhaled corticosteroids.
To compare the efficacy of initiating anti-inflammatory therapy using the combination of inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting beta2-agonists (ICS+LABA) as compared to inhaled corticosteroids alone (ICS alone) in steroid-naive children and adults with persistent asthma.
We identified randomised controlled trials (RCTs) through electronic database searches (Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL) until April 2004, bibliographies of identified RCTs and correspondence with manufacturers.
RCTs comparing the combination of inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting beta2-agonists (ICS + LABA) to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) alone in steroid-naive children and adults with asthma.
Studies were assessed independently by each reviewer for methodological quality and data extraction. Confirmation was obtained from the trialists when possible. The primary endpoint was rate of asthma exacerbations requiring systemic corticosteroids. Secondary endpoints included pulmonary function tests (PFTs), symptoms, use of other measures of asthma control, adverse events, and withdrawal rates.
Eighteen trials met the inclusion criteria; nine (totaling 1061 adults) contributed sufficient data to be analysed. Baseline forced expiratory volume in one minute (FEV1) was less than 80% predicted value in four trials and equal to or greater than 80% in five trials. The long-acting beta2-agonists (LABA) formoterol (N=2) or salmeterol (N=7) were added to a dose of at least 800 microg/day of beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) equivalent of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in three trials and to at least 400 microg/day in the six remaining trials. Treatment with ICS plus LABA was not associated with a lower risk of exacerbations requiring oral corticosteroids than ICS alone (relative risk (RR) 1.2; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.8 to 1.9). FEV1 improved significantly with LABA (weighted mean difference (WMD) 210 ml; 95% CI 120 to 300), as did symptom-free days (WMD 10.74%; 95% CI 1.86 to 19.62), but the change in use of rescue fast-acting beta2-agonists was not significantly different between the groups (WMD -0.4 puff/day, 95% CI -0.9 to 0.1). There was no significant group difference in adverse events (RR 1.1; 95% CI 0.8 to 1.5), withdrawals (RR 0.9; 95% CI 0.6 to 1.2), or withdrawals due to poor asthma control (RR 1.3; 95% CI 0.5 to 3.4).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: In steroid-naive patients with mild to moderate airway obstruction, the initiation of inhaled corticosteroids in combination with long-acting beta2-agonists does not significantly reduce the rate of exacerbations over that achieved with inhaled corticosteroids alone; it does improve lung function and symptom-free days but does not reduce rescue beta2-agonist use as compared to inhaled steroids alone. Both options appear safe. There is insufficient evidence at present to recommend use of combination therapy rather than ICS alone as a first-line treatment.
共识声明建议仅在吸入糖皮质激素治疗效果不佳的哮喘患者中加用长效吸入β2受体激动剂。
比较在初治的持续性哮喘儿童和成人中,吸入糖皮质激素与长效β2受体激动剂联合使用(ICS+LABA)和单独使用吸入糖皮质激素(单用ICS)起始抗炎治疗的疗效。
我们通过电子数据库检索(Cochrane Airways Group专业注册库、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)、医学索引数据库(MEDLINE)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(EMBASE)和护理学与健康领域数据库(CINAHL)),检索截至2004年4月的随机对照试验(RCT),并查阅已识别RCT的参考文献以及与制造商通信。
RCT比较吸入糖皮质激素与长效β2受体激动剂联合使用(ICS+LABA)和单独使用吸入糖皮质激素(ICS)在初治的哮喘儿童和成人中的疗效。
每位评审员独立评估研究的方法学质量并进行数据提取。可能的情况下向试验者进行确认。主要终点是需要全身使用糖皮质激素的哮喘加重率。次要终点包括肺功能测试(PFT)、症状、其他哮喘控制指标的使用情况、不良事件和退出率。
18项试验符合纳入标准;9项试验(共1061名成人)提供了足够的数据进行分析。4项试验中,基线第一秒用力呼气量(FEV1)低于预测值的80%,5项试验中等于或高于80%。在3项试验中,将长效β2受体激动剂(LABA)福莫特罗(N=2)或沙美特罗(N=7)添加到相当于至少800微克/天丙酸倍氯米松(BDP)的吸入糖皮质激素(ICS)剂量中,在其余6项试验中添加到至少400微克/天。与单用ICS相比,ICS加LABA治疗并未降低需要口服糖皮质激素的加重风险(相对危险度(RR)1.2;95%置信区间(CI)0.8至1.9)。LABA使FEV1显著改善(加权均数差值(WMD)210毫升;95%CI 120至300),无症状天数也显著改善(WMD 10.74%;95%CI 1.86至19.62),但两组间急救短效β2受体激动剂的使用变化无显著差异(WMD -0.4吸/天,95%CI -0.9至0.1)。不良事件(RR 1.1;95%CI 0.8至1.5)退出率(RR 0.9;95%CI 0.6至1.2)或因哮喘控制不佳导致的退出率(RR 1.3;95%CI 0.5至3.4)在组间无显著差异。
在初治的轻度至中度气道阻塞患者中,吸入糖皮质激素与长效β2受体激动剂联合起始治疗与单用吸入糖皮质激素相比,并未显著降低加重率;联合治疗确实改善了肺功能和无症状天数,但与单用吸入糖皮质激素相比,并未减少急救β2受体激动剂的使用。两种治疗方案似乎都安全。目前没有足够证据推荐联合治疗而非单用ICS作为一线治疗。