Ortho-McNeil Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Raritan, NJ 08869, USA.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2010 Jun;26(6):1433-41. doi: 10.1185/03007991003795030.
To compare the safety and efficacy of levofloxacin 750 mg QD for 2 weeks or levofloxacin 750 mg QD for 3 weeks to levofloxacin 500 mg QD for 4 weeks in treating chronic bacterial prostatitis (CBP).
This was a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, noninferiority study. The primary efficacy end point was investigator assessment of clinical success in the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population at post-therapy. National Institutes of Health-Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI) scores were utilized to evaluate subject-reported responses post-therapy.
A total of 241 subjects were enrolled. At post-therapy (test of cure [TOC]), clinical success rates for levofloxacin-treated subjects (750 mg QD for 3 weeks [64.9%, 48/74]) were noninferior to 500 mg QD for 4 weeks (69.3%, 52/75: 95% CI, -19.5%, 10.6%). Success rates with levofloxacin 750 mg QD for 2 weeks (63.0%, 46/73) were not noninferior to therapy with levofloxacin 500 mg QD for 4 weeks (95% CI, -21.5%, 8.9%) at TOC. At 3 and 6 months post-therapy, clinical success rates were clinically higher for the 500-mg, 4-week treatment group, and statistical analysis demonstrated both groups were not noninferior to standard therapy with levofloxacin 500 mg (95% CI, -32.5%, -0.6% for both 750-mg groups at 6 months). NIH-CPSI scores showed similar trends. Overall, adverse event (AE) rates were similar for the three treatment groups; however, discontinuation of therapy due to AEs was higher with the 750-mg dose (p = 0.02, and p = 0.13 for 750 mg, 2 weeks and 750 mg, 3 weeks versus 500 mg for 4 weeks, respectively). The main limitation of this study was that no bacterial cultures were required.
Higher doses for shorter durations were determined to be no worse than standard therapy with levofloxacin 500 mg for a longer duration at the TOC visit. However, at the 6-month follow-up visit, the levofloxacin 750-mg dose administered for either 2 weeks or 3 weeks was inferior to the standard therapy, suggesting that a longer duration of treatment may help extend the relapse-free interval in patients with CBP.
clinicaltrials.gov, nct00402688.
比较左氧氟沙星 750mg,qd,2 周与左氧氟沙星 750mg,qd,3 周与左氧氟沙星 500mg,qd,4 周治疗慢性细菌性前列腺炎(CBP)的安全性和疗效。
这是一项随机、多中心、双盲、非劣效性研究。主要疗效终点为治疗后改良意向治疗人群(mITT)中研究者评估的临床成功率。国家卫生研究院慢性前列腺炎症状指数(NIH-CPSI)评分用于评估治疗后受试者的报告反应。
共纳入 241 例受试者。在治疗后(验证性治疗 [TOC]),左氧氟沙星治疗组(750mg,qd,3 周)的临床成功率为 64.9%(48/74),与左氧氟沙星 500mg,qd,4 周的 69.3%(52/75)相当(95%CI,-19.5%,10.6%)。左氧氟沙星 750mg,qd,2 周治疗组的成功率(63.0%,46/73)与左氧氟沙星 500mg,qd,4 周的非劣效性不成立(95%CI,-21.5%,8.9%)。在治疗后 3 个月和 6 个月时,500mg,4 周治疗组的临床成功率更高,统计学分析表明两组均与左氧氟沙星 500mg 的标准治疗不相当(95%CI,-32.5%,-0.6%,两组在 6 个月时)。NIH-CPSI 评分也显示出类似的趋势。总的来说,三组治疗的不良反应(AE)发生率相似;然而,由于 AE 导致的治疗中止率在 750mg 剂量组更高(p=0.02,750mg,2 周和 750mg,3 周分别与 500mg,4 周相比,p=0.13)。本研究的主要局限性是没有要求进行细菌培养。
在 TOC 访视时,较短时间内使用较高剂量与左氧氟沙星 500mg 标准治疗相比,在疗效上没有差异,但在 6 个月随访时,左氧氟沙星 750mg,2 周或 3 周治疗组劣于标准治疗,提示更长的治疗时间可能有助于延长 CBP 患者的无复发间期。
clinicaltrials.gov,nct00402688。