发展合作关系,以减少癌症筛查中的差异。

Developing partnerships to reduce disparities in cancer screening.

机构信息

National Cancer Institute, 6130 Executive Blvd, Ste 4098, Bethesda, MD 20850, USA.

出版信息

Prev Chronic Dis. 2010 May;7(3):A62. Epub 2010 Apr 15.

DOI:
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Interventions in scientific settings to improve the well-being of women who are not regularly screened for cancer have failed. Consequently, community-based prevention and control efforts are needed.

COMMUNITY CONTEXT

From 2003 through 2007, three federal agencies and 1 nongovernmental agency collaborated with county-level public health counterparts from 6 states to address screening disparities in cervical and breast cancer in counties with the highest prevalence. This case study describes lessons learned from Team Up, a model pilot program.

METHODS

We conducted a descriptive qualitative case study including 5 Southern states and 1 Midwestern state: Alabama, Georgia, Kentucky, Missouri, South Carolina, and Tennessee. The 6 states underwent a 5-step process to adopt, adapt, and implement 1 of 3 evidence-based interventions designed for cervical and breast cancer screening.

OUTCOME

The 6 participating states had various levels of success. Participating states formed and sustained viable interorganizational public health partnerships throughout the pilot program and beyond.

INTERPRETATION

Although this innovative pilot faced many difficulties, participants overcame substantial obstacles and produced many key accomplishments. Team Up brought together 2 challenging public health strategies: the translation of evidence-based approaches to communities and populations, and partnerships among diverse people and organizations. Case study results suggest that using a mix of approaches can promote the transference of evidence from research into practice through local, regional, and national partnerships.

摘要

背景

针对未定期进行癌症筛查的女性开展的科学领域干预措施未能改善其健康状况。因此,需要开展基于社区的预防和控制工作。

社区背景

2003 年至 2007 年期间,3 个联邦机构和 1 个非政府机构与来自 6 个州的县级公共卫生部门合作,在癌症发病率最高的县解决宫颈癌和乳腺癌筛查方面的差异问题。本案例研究介绍了 Team Up 这一试点示范项目的经验教训。

方法

我们开展了一项描述性定性案例研究,涵盖 5 个南部州和 1 个中西部州:阿拉巴马州、佐治亚州、肯塔基州、密苏里州、南卡罗来纳州和田纳西州。这 6 个州经历了 5 个步骤,以采用、改编和实施旨在促进宫颈癌和乳腺癌筛查的 3 种循证干预措施之一。

结果

6 个参与州取得了不同程度的成功。参与州在整个试点项目及之后,都形成并维持了可行的跨组织公共卫生伙伴关系。

解释

尽管这项创新试点项目面临诸多困难,但参与者克服了重重障碍,取得了许多重要成果。Team Up 将两项具有挑战性的公共卫生策略结合在一起:即将循证方法转化为社区和人群的方法,以及不同人群和组织之间的伙伴关系。案例研究结果表明,通过地方、区域和国家伙伴关系,采用混合方法可以促进证据从研究向实践的转移。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0a7/2879994/8a0d1168ac63/PCD73A62s01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索