Lee Simon J Craddock, Higashi Robin T, Inrig Stephen J, Sanders Joanne M, Zhu Hong, Argenbright Keith E, Tiro Jasmin A
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX, 75390-9066, USA.
Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Transl Behav Med. 2017 Jun;7(2):349-357. doi: 10.1007/s13142-016-0427-3.
Rural mammography screening remains suboptimal despite reimbursement programs for uninsured women. Networks linking non-clinical community organizations and clinical providers may overcome limited delivery infrastructure in rural areas. Little is known about how networks expand their service area. To evaluate a hub-and-spoke model to expand mammography services to 17 rural counties by assessing county-level delivery and local stakeholder conduct of outreach activities. We conducted a mixed-method evaluation using EMR data, systematic site visits (73 interviews, 51 organizations), 92 patient surveys, and 30 patient interviews. A two-sample t test compared the weighted monthly average of women served between hub- and spoke-led counties; nonparametric trend test evaluated time trend over the study period; Pearson chi-square compared sociodemographic data between hub- and spoke-led counties. From 2013 to 2014, the program screened 4603 underinsured women. Counties where local "spoke" organizations led outreach activities achieved comparable screening rates to hub-led counties (9.2 and 8.7, respectively, p = 0.984) and did not vary over time (p = 0.866). Qualitative analyses revealed influence of program champions, participant language preference, and stakeholders' concerns about uncompensated care. A program that leverages local organizations' ability to identify and reach rural underserved populations is a feasible approach for expanding preventive services delivery.
尽管有为未参保女性提供的报销计划,但农村地区的乳腺钼靶筛查仍未达到最佳水平。连接非临床社区组织和临床医疗服务提供者的网络可能会克服农村地区有限的服务提供基础设施问题。关于这些网络如何扩大其服务范围,人们了解得很少。为了评估一种中心辐射模式,通过评估县级服务提供情况以及当地利益相关者开展的外展活动,将乳腺钼靶服务扩展到17个农村县。我们使用电子病历数据、系统的实地考察(73次访谈,51个组织)、92份患者调查问卷和30次患者访谈进行了混合方法评估。双样本t检验比较了由中心和辐射点主导的县之间服务女性的加权月平均数;非参数趋势检验评估了研究期间的时间趋势;Pearson卡方检验比较了由中心和辐射点主导的县之间的社会人口学数据。从2013年到2014年,该项目为4603名未充分参保的女性进行了筛查。当地“辐射点”组织主导外展活动的县,其筛查率与由中心主导的县相当(分别为9.2和8.7,p = 0.984),且随时间没有变化(p = 0.866)。定性分析揭示了项目支持者的影响、参与者的语言偏好以及利益相关者对无偿护理的担忧。利用当地组织识别和接触农村服务不足人群能力的项目是扩大预防性服务提供的一种可行方法。