• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分叉病变的病理学发现:血流分布对支架植入后动脉粥样硬化和动脉愈合的影响。

Pathological findings at bifurcation lesions: the impact of flow distribution on atherosclerosis and arterial healing after stent implantation.

机构信息

CVPath Institute, Inc, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20878, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Apr 20;55(16):1679-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.01.021.

DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2010.01.021
PMID:20394871
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Using human pathologic specimens from the CVPath registry, we aimed to investigate the location of the atherosclerotic plaque at bifurcation in native coronary atherosclerotic lesions and to determine the responses at bifurcation after implantation of bare-metal stents (BMS) and drug-eluting stents (DES).

BACKGROUND

Greater atherosclerotic plaque burden has been reported to occur at low-shear regions of bifurcation.

METHODS

Twenty-six randomly selected human atherosclerotic nonstented coronary bifurcation lesions were examined longitudinally for plaque distribution in patients dying of severe coronary artery disease. Forty stented bifurcation lesions (21 BMS and 19 DES) were reviewed and analyzed by morphometry.

RESULTS

In nonstented coronary bifurcations, the lateral wall showed significantly greater intima as well as necrotic core thickness than the flow divider. In the stented lesion, the frequency of late stent thrombosis was greater in the DES group (75%) than in the BMS group (36%), whereas restenosis was more frequent in the BMS group (33%) than in the DES group (5%). Neointimal formation was significantly less at the flow divider compared with the lateral wall in the DES group (0.07 mm [interquartile range (IQR) 0.03 to 0.15 mm] vs. 0.17 mm [IQR 0.09 to 0.23 mm]; p = 0.001), whereas this difference was not significant in the BMS group. Similarly, uncovered struts and fibrin deposition was significantly greater at the flow divider compared with the lateral wall in the DES group (uncovered: 40% [IQR 16% to 76%] vs. 0% [IQR 0% to 15%]; p = 0.001; fibrin: 60% [IQR 21% to 67%] vs. 17% [IQR 0% to 55%]; p = 0.01), but not in the BMS group.

CONCLUSIONS

Plaque formation in native coronary bifurcations and neointimal growth after DES implantation was significantly less at the flow divider versus the lateral wall. A higher prevalence of late stent thrombosis in DES compared with BMS was associated with greater uncovered struts at flow divider sites, which is likely due to flow disturbances.

摘要

目的

使用 CVPath 注册中心的人体病理标本,我们旨在研究原发性冠状动脉粥样硬化病变中分叉处粥样斑块的位置,并确定裸金属支架(BMS)和药物洗脱支架(DES)植入后分叉处的反应。

背景

据报道,在分叉的低切变区域发生的动脉粥样硬化斑块负担更大。

方法

对 26 例死于严重冠状动脉疾病的患者的非支架冠状动脉分叉病变进行了 26 例随机选择的人粥样硬化非支架冠状动脉分叉病变的纵向斑块分布检查。通过形态计量学对 40 个支架分叉病变(21 个 BMS 和 19 个 DES)进行了回顾性分析。

结果

在非支架冠状动脉分叉处,外侧壁的内膜和坏死核心厚度明显大于分流器。在支架病变中,DES 组晚期支架血栓形成的频率(75%)明显高于 BMS 组(36%),而 BMS 组的再狭窄率(33%)明显高于 DES 组(5%)。DES 组在分流器处的新生内膜形成明显小于外侧壁(0.07 毫米[四分位距(IQR)0.03 至 0.15 毫米]比 0.17 毫米[IQR 0.09 至 0.23 毫米];p = 0.001),而 BMS 组无显著差异。同样,DES 组在分流器处的未覆盖支架和纤维蛋白沉积明显大于外侧壁(未覆盖:40%[IQR 16%至 76%]比 0%[IQR 0%至 15%];p = 0.001;纤维蛋白:60%[IQR 21%至 67%]比 17%[IQR 0%至 55%];p = 0.01),但 BMS 组无显著差异。

结论

与外侧壁相比,在原生冠状动脉分叉处的斑块形成和 DES 植入后的新生内膜生长在分流器处明显减少。DES 与 BMS 相比,晚期支架血栓形成的发生率更高,这与分流器部位更大的未覆盖支架有关,这可能是由于血流紊乱所致。

相似文献

1
Pathological findings at bifurcation lesions: the impact of flow distribution on atherosclerosis and arterial healing after stent implantation.分叉病变的病理学发现:血流分布对支架植入后动脉粥样硬化和动脉愈合的影响。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Apr 20;55(16):1679-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.01.021.
2
Delayed arterial healing and increased late stent thrombosis at culprit sites after drug-eluting stent placement for acute myocardial infarction patients: an autopsy study.急性心肌梗死患者药物洗脱支架置入术后罪犯部位动脉愈合延迟及晚期支架血栓形成增加:一项尸检研究。
Circulation. 2008 Sep 9;118(11):1138-45. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.762047. Epub 2008 Aug 25.
3
Comparison of drug eluting stents with bare metal stents in daily practice for bifurcation lesions in Chinese patients.在中国患者日常治疗中药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架用于分叉病变的比较。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2006 Jul 20;119(14):1157-64.
4
Relationship between neointimal coverage of sirolimus-eluting stents and lesion characteristics: a study with serial coronary angioscopy.西罗莫司洗脱支架的新生内膜覆盖与病变特征之间的关系:一项冠状动脉血管内镜系列研究
Am Heart J. 2009 Jul;158(1):99-104. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.04.016.
5
Are drug-eluting stents indicated in large coronary arteries? Insights from a multi-centre percutaneous coronary intervention registry.药物洗脱支架适用于大冠状动脉吗?来自多中心经皮冠状动脉介入治疗注册研究的见解。
Int J Cardiol. 2008 Nov 28;130(3):374-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2008.06.046. Epub 2008 Aug 15.
6
Pathology of drug-eluting stents in humans: delayed healing and late thrombotic risk.药物洗脱支架在人体中的病理学:愈合延迟和晚期血栓形成风险。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Jul 4;48(1):193-202. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.03.042. Epub 2006 May 5.
7
Atheroma and coronary bifurcations: before and after stenting.动脉粥样硬化与冠状动脉分叉病变:支架置入前后。
EuroIntervention. 2010 Dec;6 Suppl J:J24-30. doi: 10.4244/EIJV6SUPJA5.
8
[Visualization of intimal proliferation of drug-eluting stent and bare mental stent by use of optical coherence tomography].[利用光学相干断层扫描技术可视化药物洗脱支架和裸金属支架的内膜增生]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2006 Apr 25;86(16):1102-6.
9
Clinical outcomes following drug-eluting versus bare metal stent implantation for lesion subsets excluded from pivotal clinical trials: findings from the GHOST Study (Guthrie Health System Off-Label StenT Study).药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架植入治疗关键临床试验排除的病变亚组后的临床结局:GHOST研究(格思里医疗系统非标签支架研究)的结果
J Interv Cardiol. 2008 Aug;21(4):315-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2008.00380.x.
10
Incidence and predictors of drug-eluting stent fracture in human coronary artery a pathologic analysis.药物洗脱支架在人体冠状动脉中骨折的发生率及预测因素:一项病理分析
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Nov 17;54(21):1924-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.05.075.

引用本文的文献

1
Coronary Calcification: Types, Morphology and Distribution.冠状动脉钙化:类型、形态及分布
Interv Cardiol. 2025 Apr 7;20:e13. doi: 10.15420/icr.2024.03. eCollection 2025.
2
The influence of reverse flow within side branches on plaque formation relative to coronary bifurcation angles.相对于冠状动脉分叉角度,侧支内的逆向血流对斑块形成的影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 8;15(1):11977. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-89427-w.
3
The Role of Calcified Nodules in Acute Coronary Syndrome: Diagnosis and Management.钙化结节在急性冠状动脉综合征中的作用:诊断与管理
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Mar 13;26(6):2581. doi: 10.3390/ijms26062581.
4
Impact of Diabetes on Long-Term Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Coronary Bifurcation Lesions.糖尿病对冠状动脉分叉病变经皮冠状动脉介入治疗长期预后的影响。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Aug;106(2):743-751. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31476. Epub 2025 Mar 5.
5
The interdependent hemodynamic influence between abdominal aortic aneurysm and renal artery stenosis.腹主动脉瘤与肾动脉狭窄之间相互依存的血流动力学影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 30;14(1):31986. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83622-x.
6
Unveiling the therapeutic potential of miR-146a: Targeting innate inflammation in atherosclerosis.揭示 miR-146a 的治疗潜力:靶向动脉粥样硬化中的固有炎症。
J Cell Mol Med. 2024 Oct;28(19):e70121. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.70121.
7
Review of Progress in Interventional Therapy for Coronary Bifurcation Lesions.冠状动脉分叉病变介入治疗进展综述
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Jan 4;25(1):2. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2501002. eCollection 2024 Jan.
8
Calcified Nodules in Non-Culprit Lesions with Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients.急性冠状动脉综合征患者非罪犯病变中的钙化结节
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Apr 7;25(4):136. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2504136. eCollection 2024 Apr.
9
Integrating Computational and Biological Hemodynamic Approaches to Improve Modeling of Atherosclerotic Arteries.整合计算和生物学血流动力学方法,改进动脉粥样硬化血管建模。
Adv Sci (Weinh). 2024 Jul;11(26):e2307627. doi: 10.1002/advs.202307627. Epub 2024 May 5.
10
Clinical prediction factors of nonchronic total occlusion lesion progression in patients with unstable angina receiving percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion lesions.接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗慢性完全闭塞病变的不稳定型心绞痛患者非慢性完全闭塞病变进展的临床预测因素。
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2024 Mar 25;51:101395. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101395. eCollection 2024 Apr.