Department of Trauma Surgery and Sports Medicine, Innsbruck Medical University, Anichstrasse 35, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Injury. 2011 Apr;42(4):324-9. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.02.033. Epub 2010 Apr 14.
Elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) of displaced mid-shaft clavicular fractures is a minimally invasive technique which was reported to be an easy procedure with low complication rates, good cosmetic and functional results, restoration of clavicular length and fast return to daily activities. Recent studies, however, also report on higher complication rates and specific problems with the use of this technique. This prospective study compares ESIN with non-operative treatment of displaced mid-shaft clavicular fractures.
Between December 2003 and August 2007, 120 patients volunteered to participate. Of these, 112 patients completed the study (60 in the operative and 52 in the non-operative group). Patients in the non-operative group were treated with a simple shoulder sling. In the operative group, intramedullary stabilisation was performed within 3 days of the trauma. Clavicular shortening was determined after trauma and after osseous consolidation on thorax posteroanterior radiographs as the proportional length difference between the left and right side with the uninjured side serving as a control for clavicular length (100%). Radiographic union was assessed every 4 weeks on 20 degrees cephalad anteroposterior and posteroanterior radiographs of the clavicle. Constant shoulder scores and DASH scores (DASH, disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) were assessed at final follow-up after 2 years.
ESIN led to faster osseous healing and better restoration of clavicular length in simple fractures. We were not able to restore clavicular length in comminuted fractures using ESIN. Functional outcome at a mean follow-up of 24 months (range: 22-27 months) was better in the operative group. Delayed union and non-union accounted for the majority of complications in the non-operative group. In the operative group, telescoping was the main complication, which occurred in complex fractures with severe post-traumatic shortening only.
We recommend ESIN for all simple displaced mid-shaft clavicular fractures in order to minimise the rate of delayed union, non-union and symptomatic mal-union. We also recommend ESIN in comminuted fractures with moderate (< or = 7%) post-traumatic shortening, as they will heal with moderate shortening. In comminuted fractures with severe shortening, however, we recommend plate osteosynthesis in order to provide for stability, clavicular length and endosteal blood supply.
弹性髓内钉(ESIN)固定移位的锁骨中段骨折是一种微创技术,报道称该技术具有操作简单、并发症发生率低、美容和功能效果好、恢复锁骨长度以及快速恢复日常活动的优点。然而,最近的研究也报告了该技术的更高并发症发生率和特定问题。本前瞻性研究比较了 ESIN 与移位的锁骨中段骨折的非手术治疗。
2003 年 12 月至 2007 年 8 月期间,共有 120 名患者自愿参与。其中,112 名患者完成了研究(手术组 60 例,非手术组 52 例)。非手术组患者采用简单的肩部吊带治疗。手术组在创伤后 3 天内进行髓内稳定。锁骨缩短在创伤后和胸廓前后位 X 线片上骨愈合后确定,左侧和右侧之间的比例长度差异作为锁骨长度的对照(100%)。每 4 周评估锁骨的 20°头侧前后位和前后位 X 线片上的放射学愈合情况。在 2 年后的最终随访时,使用 Constant 肩部评分和 DASH 评分(DASH,手臂、肩部和手部的残疾)进行评估。
ESIN 导致简单骨折的骨愈合更快,锁骨长度恢复更好。我们无法使用 ESIN 恢复粉碎性骨折的锁骨长度。平均随访 24 个月(范围:22-27 个月)后,手术组的功能结果更好。延迟愈合和不愈合是导致非手术组大多数并发症的原因。在手术组中,伸缩是主要并发症,仅发生在严重创伤后缩短的复杂骨折中。
我们建议对所有简单移位的锁骨中段骨折采用 ESIN,以降低延迟愈合、不愈合和症状性畸形愈合的发生率。我们还建议对创伤后缩短中度(<=7%)的粉碎性骨折采用 ESIN,因为它们会在中度缩短的情况下愈合。然而,对于严重缩短的粉碎性骨折,我们建议采用钢板内固定以提供稳定性、锁骨长度和骨内血供。