SINAPSE Collaboration, SFC Brain Imaging Research Centre, Division of Clinical Neurosciences, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK.
Stroke. 2010 Jun;41(6):e434-42. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.569855. Epub 2010 Apr 15.
The etiology of cerebral small vessel disease is unknown. An association with endothelial dysfunction has been suggested. We systematically assessed all relevant studies of dynamic endothelial function in patients with lacunar stroke as a marker of small vessel disease.
We searched for studies of cerebral or peripheral vascular reactivity in patients with lacunar or cortical (ie, large artery atheromatous) ischemic stroke or nonstroke control subjects. We calculated standardized mean difference (SMD) in vascular reactivity+/-95% CIs between small vessel disease and control groups.
Sixteen publications (974 patients) were included. In lacunar stroke, cerebrovascular reactivity (n=534) was reduced compared with age-matched normal (SMD -0.94, 95% CI -1.17 to -0.70), but not age+risk factor-matched control subjects (SMD 0.08, 95% CI -0.36 to 0.53) or cortical strokes (SMD -0.29, 95% CI -0.69 to 0.11); forearm flow-mediated dilatation (n=401) was reduced compared with age-matched normal control subjects (SMD -1.04, 95% CI -1.33 to -0.75) and age+risk factor-matched control subjects (SMD -0.94, 95% CI -1.26 to -0.61), but not cortical strokes (SMD -0.23, 95% CI -0.55 to 0.08).
Endothelial dysfunction is present in patients with lacunar stroke but may simply reflect exposure to vascular risk factors and having a stroke, because a similar degree of dysfunction is found in cortical (large artery atheromatous) stroke. Current data do not confirm that endothelial dysfunction is specific to small vessel stroke. Future studies should include control subjects with nonlacunar stroke.
脑小血管病的病因尚不清楚。有研究提示其与血管内皮功能障碍相关。本研究系统评估了所有腔隙性卒中和皮质性(即大动脉粥样硬化性)缺血性卒中和非卒中等病例的动态内皮功能相关研究,以评估其作为小血管病标志物的价值。
我们检索了评估腔隙性或皮质性(即大动脉粥样硬化性)缺血性卒中和非卒中等病例的脑血管或外周血管反应性的研究。我们计算了小血管病组与对照组之间血管反应性的标准化均数差值(SMD)±95%可信区间。
共纳入 16 项研究(974 例患者)。腔隙性卒中患者的脑血管反应性(n=534)较年龄匹配的正常对照显著降低(SMD -0.94,95%CI -1.17 至 -0.70),但与年龄+危险因素匹配的对照组(SMD 0.08,95%CI -0.36 至 0.53)或皮质性卒中患者(SMD -0.29,95%CI -0.69 至 0.11)无显著差异;前臂血流介导的扩张(n=401)较年龄匹配的正常对照组显著降低(SMD -1.04,95%CI -1.33 至 -0.75)和年龄+危险因素匹配的对照组(SMD -0.94,95%CI -1.26 至 -0.61),但与皮质性卒中患者(SMD -0.23,95%CI -0.55 至 0.08)无显著差异。
内皮功能障碍存在于腔隙性卒中患者中,但可能只是反映了血管危险因素的暴露和卒中的发生,因为在皮质性(大动脉粥样硬化性)卒中患者中也发现了类似程度的功能障碍。目前的数据并不能证实内皮功能障碍是小血管性卒中的特异性改变。未来的研究应包括非腔隙性卒中的对照组。