• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对反思性学习日志在在线研究生护理教育中应用的认知

Perceptions of the use of reflective learning journals in online graduate nursing education.

作者信息

Langley Malinda E, Brown Sylvia T

机构信息

Cape Fear Valley Health System, Fayetteville, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

Nurs Educ Perspect. 2010 Jan-Feb;31(1):12-7.

PMID:20397474
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the perceptions of graduate nursing students and a small sample of faculty regarding learning outcomes associated with reflective learning journals (RLJ) in online education. Reflective journaling is used extensively in nursing curricula, yet few studies have explored perceptions of learning outcomes with online students, specifically those preparing to become nurse educators.An electronic survey was developed utilizing items associated with four learning outcomes of reflective journaling: professional development, personal growth, empowerment, and facilitation of the learning process. Positive outcomes such as the connection between theory and practice, recognition of strengths and weaknesses, and integration of new ideas and concepts were identified. Obstacles included the amount of time needed for reflection and grading, and the development of trust between students and faculty. The results of this study indicate that graduate students and faculty perceive positive learning outcomes with the use of reflective journals in online education.

摘要

本研究的目的是调查护理学研究生以及一小部分教员对于在线教育中与反思学习日志(RLJ)相关的学习成果的看法。反思日志在护理课程中被广泛使用,但很少有研究探讨在线学生,特别是那些准备成为护理教育工作者的学生对学习成果的看法。通过与反思日志的四个学习成果相关的项目开发了一项电子调查:专业发展、个人成长、赋权和促进学习过程。确定了诸如理论与实践之间的联系、对优势和劣势的认识以及新思想和概念的整合等积极成果。障碍包括反思和评分所需的时间,以及学生和教员之间信任的建立。本研究结果表明,研究生和教员认为在在线教育中使用反思日志能带来积极的学习成果。

相似文献

1
Perceptions of the use of reflective learning journals in online graduate nursing education.对反思性学习日志在在线研究生护理教育中应用的认知
Nurs Educ Perspect. 2010 Jan-Feb;31(1):12-7.
2
Using a constructivist approach with online concept maps: relationship between theory and nursing education.将建构主义方法应用于在线概念图:理论与护理教育之间的关系。
Nurs Educ Perspect. 2007 Sep-Oct;28(5):268-75.
3
Evaluation of online course discussions. Faculty facilitation of active student learning.在线课程讨论评估。教师对学生主动学习的促进作用。
Comput Nurs. 2000 Jul-Aug;18(4):181-8.
4
Use of an online writing tutorial to improve writing skills in nursing courses.利用在线写作教程提高护理课程的写作技能。
Nurse Educ. 2009 Nov-Dec;34(6):262-5. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0b013e3181bc740d.
5
Evaluation of interactive online courses for advanced practice nurses.针对高级执业护士的交互式在线课程评估。
J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2005 Mar;17(3):85-9. doi: 10.111/j.1041-2972.2005.0015.x.
6
Graduate students' perceptions of online teaching and relationship to preferred learning styles.研究生对在线教学的看法及其与偏好学习风格的关系。
Medsurg Nurs. 2005 Dec;14(6):383-9.
7
Reflective education for professional practice: discovering knowledge from experience.专业实践的反思性教育:从经验中发现知识。
Nurse Educ Today. 1999 Jan;19(1):29-34. doi: 10.1054/nedt.1999.0607.
8
Quality of faculty, students, curriculum and resources for nursing doctoral education in Korea: a focus group study.韩国护理博士教育的师资、学生、课程和资源质量:一项焦点小组研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2010 Mar;47(3):295-306. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.07.005. Epub 2009 Aug 15.
9
Web journaling. Using informational technology to teach reflective practice.网络日志。利用信息技术教授反思性实践。
Nurs Leadersh Forum. 2002 Summer;6(4):108-12.
10
Learning portfolios: giving meaning to practice.学习档案袋:赋予实践以意义。
Nurse Educ. 2008 May-Jun;33(3):125-7. doi: 10.1097/01.NNE.0000312181.90400.cc.

引用本文的文献

1
Community researchers conducting health disparities research: Ethical and other insights from fieldwork journaling.社区研究人员开展健康差异研究:田野工作日记中的伦理和其他见解。
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Jul;73(1):145-52. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.04.029. Epub 2011 May 30.