• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[标准化汉语单音节听力测试材料的研制与评估]

[Development and evaluation of standardized Mandarin monosyllable audiometric materials].

作者信息

Xi Xin, Ji Fei, Chen Ai-ting, Zhao Wu-lan, Zhao Yang, Xu Jian, Qiu Chun-yan, Li Jian-hui, Han Dong-yi

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, General Hospital of Chinese People's Liberation Army, Beijing 100853, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2010 Jan;45(1):7-13.

PMID:20398530
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop a set of Mandarin monosyllabic list for the goal to use as a standardized speech recognition assessment tool in China with sufficient validity, reliability and sensitivity.

METHODS

Thirty lists were designed based on the following criteria: efficiency, phonemic-balance, familiarity and coverage, while each list was designed corresponding to 25 monosyllables. These lists were read by a male broadcaster, recorded digitally and composed into compact disc. Our work consisted of three phases. Phase I: Sixty adults with normal hearing were recruited from Beijing to repeat as many syllables which they heard as possible. According to the randomized block design, 30 lists were presented with 6 intensities including -1 dB, 5 dB, 11 dB, 15 dB, 21 dB and 27 dB HL(speech). The lists and intensities were counterbalanced across all participants. Recognition scores in individual intensities for each list were calculated, and then logistic regression was utilized to fit Performance-Intensity (P-I) function. Two-way (list No. and Intensity) repeated measurement analysis of variance and Post-Hoc Tukey HSD test indicated that 22 lists were equivalent. Phase II: Twenty-two oral/aural normal adults were recruited to assess monosyllable recognition scores with the 22 equivalent lists at 10 dB HL(Speech), according to the Latin-Square design. Tests were administered twice for all participants with the same procedure and situation during 6 to 35 day intervals. The differences in scores (after a "rationalized" arcsine transformation) among 22 lists across over the two sessions is 9.3%, the data were collected from 22 participants, the measurement error was calculated by SD (standard deviation), the critical difference (CD) for test score improvement was 18.3% (determined as SD x 1.96, in 95% confidence level). Phase III: Eighteen participants with sensorineural hearing loss were recruited to assess recognition perception using 18 equivalent monosyllable lists at 30 dB suprathreshold based on Latin-Square design. Tests were administered twice by using the same procedure and situation within 1 to 16 day intervals. The same approach in Phase II was utilized to calculate SD (8.3%). The CD was calculated as 16.3% (in 95% confidence level).

RESULTS

A set of standardized Mandarin recognition assessment material had been developed and it consisted of 22 equivalent phonemic-balanced lists with 25 monosyllables each. Approximately, every single list took 2 minutes, and thus it might be appropriate for clinical assessment. The P-I functions reveal that the recognition threshold was (8.30 +/- 0.84) dB HL(speech) and the slope of PI functions was (4.0 +/- 0.3)%/dB for adults with normal hearing. When a set of Mandarin monosyllable lists was utilized as an assessment tool, the critical difference of 18.3% (for normal-hearing adults) and 16.3% (for hearing-impaired adults) would be a key for clinicians to assess the improvement of speech recognition ability appropriately with statistically significance.

CONCLUSION

In this study, a new Mandarin monosyllabic lists has been successfully developed with a sufficient validity, reliability and sensitivity for clinical evaluations, thus it might be convenience and helpful to be used as a standardized speech recognition assessment tool in China.

摘要

目的

开发一套汉语单音节词表,旨在作为一种在中国具有足够效度、信度和敏感度的标准化言语识别评估工具。

方法

基于效率、音素平衡、熟悉度和覆盖范围等标准设计了30个词表,每个词表对应25个单音节。这些词表由一名男性播音员朗读,进行数字录音并制成光盘。我们的工作包括三个阶段。第一阶段:从北京招募60名听力正常的成年人,让他们尽可能多地重复所听到的音节。根据随机区组设计,呈现30个词表,有6种强度,分别为-1 dB、5 dB、11 dB、15 dB、21 dB和27 dB HL(言语)。词表和强度在所有参与者中进行平衡。计算每个词表在各个强度下的识别分数,然后利用逻辑回归拟合性能-强度(P-I)函数。双向(词表编号和强度)重复测量方差分析及事后Tukey HSD检验表明22个词表等效。第二阶段:招募22名口/耳正常的成年人,根据拉丁方设计,用这22个等效词表在10 dB HL(言语)下评估单音节识别分数。所有参与者在6至35天的间隔内,按照相同程序和情境进行两次测试。对22个词表在两次测试中的分数(经过“合理化”反正弦变换后)差异为9.3%,数据来自22名参与者,测量误差用标准差(SD)计算,测试分数改善的临界差异(CD)为18.3%(在95%置信水平下确定为SD×1.96)。第三阶段:招募18名感音神经性听力损失的参与者,根据拉丁方设计,用18个等效单音节词表在高于阈值30 dB时评估识别感知。在1至16天的间隔内,按照相同程序和情境对所有参与者进行两次测试。采用与第二阶段相同的方法计算标准差(8.3%)。临界差异计算为16.3%(在95%置信水平下)。

结果

开发出一套标准化的汉语识别评估材料,它由22个等效的音素平衡词表组成,每个词表有25个单音节。每个词表大约用时2分钟,因此可能适用于临床评估。P-I函数显示,听力正常成年人的识别阈值为(8.30±0.84)dB HL(言语),P-I函数的斜率为(4.0±0.3)%/dB。当将这套汉语单音节词表用作评估工具时,18.3%(听力正常成年人)和16.3%(听力受损成年人)的临界差异将是临床医生以统计学显著性适当评估言语识别能力改善情况的关键。

结论

在本研究中,成功开发出一套新的汉语单音节词表,具有足够的效度、信度和敏感度用于临床评估,因此它可能便于在中国用作标准化言语识别评估工具。

相似文献

1
[Development and evaluation of standardized Mandarin monosyllable audiometric materials].[标准化汉语单音节听力测试材料的研制与评估]
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2010 Jan;45(1):7-13.
2
[Development and equivalence evaluation of monosyllable lists of mandarin speech test materials].[汉语言语测试材料单音节词表的研制及等价性评价]
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2006 May;41(5):341-5.
3
[Performance-intensity function of mandarin monosyllable and sentence materials for normal-hearing subjects].[正常听力受试者普通话单音节和句子材料的性能强度函数]
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2008 Jan;22(1):1-4.
4
Development of a mandarin monosyllable test material with homogenous items (II): lists equivalence evaluation.具有同质项目的汉语单音节测试材料的开发(II):列表等效性评估
Acta Otolaryngol. 2011 Oct;131(10):1051-60. doi: 10.3109/00016489.2011.583267. Epub 2011 May 23.
5
Development of a Mandarin monosyllable test material with homogenous items (I): homogeneity selection.具有同质项目的汉语单音节测试材料的开发(I):同质性选择
Acta Otolaryngol. 2011 Sep;131(9):962-9. doi: 10.3109/00016489.2011.574646. Epub 2011 May 2.
6
Development and evaluation of Mandarin disyllabic materials for speech audiometry in China.中国用于言语测听的汉语双音节材料的开发与评估。
Int J Audiol. 2007 Dec;46(12):719-31. doi: 10.1080/14992020701558511.
7
Development of Mandarin monosyllabic speech test materials in China.普通话单音节言语测试材料的研制。
Int J Audiol. 2009 May;48(5):300-11. doi: 10.1080/14992020802607456.
8
Development of the Mandarin early speech perception test: children with normal hearing and the effects of dialect exposure.普通话早期言语感知测试的开发:听力正常儿童及方言接触的影响
Ear Hear. 2009 Oct;30(5):600-12. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181b4aba8.
9
[Normative data of disyllabic Mandarin speech test materials for normally hearing people].
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2007 Jan;21(1):18-21.
10
[Edit and evaluation of Mandarin sentence materials for Chinese speech audiometry].[汉语言语测听用汉语句子材料的编辑与评估]
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2005 Oct;40(10):774-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Hearing outcomes following cochlear implantation with anatomic or default frequency mapping in postlingual deafness adults.成人后天聋患者采用解剖或默认频率映射进行人工耳蜗植入后的听力结果。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Feb;281(2):719-729. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-08151-1. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
2
Development and Validation of a Mandarin Chinese Adaptation of AzBio Sentence Test (CMnBio).中文简体版 AzBio 句子测试(CMnBio)的编制与验证。
Trends Hear. 2022 Jan-Dec;26:23312165221134007. doi: 10.1177/23312165221134007.
3
Evaluation of Mandarin Chinese Speech Recognition in Adults with Cochlear Implants Using the Spectral Ripple Discrimination Test.
使用频谱波纹辨别测试评估人工耳蜗植入者的普通话语音识别能力。
Med Sci Monit. 2018 May 28;24:3557-3563. doi: 10.12659/MSM.907491.