Suppr超能文献

药物洗脱支架随机试验中常规血管造影随访的临床影响:对伴有中度病变患者“眼-口狭窄”再介入治疗的批判性评估。

The clinical impact of routine angiographic follow-up in randomized trials of drug-eluting stents: a critical assessment of "oculostenotic" reintervention in patients with intermediate lesions.

机构信息

Innovations in Interventional Cardiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts 01752, USA.

出版信息

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Apr;3(4):403-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.01.010.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to study the long-term clinical effects of routine angiographic follow-up and related reintervention after drug-eluting stenting.

BACKGROUND

Prior stent trials have shown that protocol-mandated angiographic follow-up increases repeat interventions compared with clinical follow-up alone. The long-term clinical impact of this practice is unknown.

METHODS

Long-term outcomes of patients assigned to routine angiographic follow-up in 3 large-scale TAXUS (Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts) trials were compared with patients assigned to clinical follow-up alone, in a propensity score-adjusted patient-level meta-analysis. Outcomes were also compared in patients with treated versus untreated nonischemic intermediate lesions (quantitative angiographic stenosis between >or=40% and <70%) detected at angiographic follow-up.

RESULTS

Target lesion revascularization (TLR) rates at 5 years were significantly higher in the angiographic compared with clinical follow-up cohort (18.3% vs. 11.1%, p < 0.001). This was due to more frequent treatment of intermediate lesions, but there was no associated reduction in rates of cardiac death or myocardial infarction (8.9% vs. 8.8%, p = 0.93). Of patients with nonischemic intermediate lesions, 17% who were not revascularized at the time of angiographic follow-up had a subsequent TLR, whereas 7% of patients who had TLR at this follow-up angiogram required additional revascularization during long-term follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

A strategy of routine angiographic follow-up increases oculostenotic revascularization of nonischemic intermediate lesions without affecting subsequent rates of cardiac death or myocardial infarction, and TLR was not required in 83% of those lesions. A conservative approach, in which repeat angiography is limited to patients with recurrent ischemia or progressive symptoms, minimizes repeat revascularization of nonischemic intermediate lesions and optimizes long-term event-free survival after drug-eluting stent implantation.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在研究药物洗脱支架置入后常规血管造影随访及相关再介入治疗的长期临床效果。

背景

先前的支架试验表明,与单纯临床随访相比,方案规定的血管造影随访增加了重复介入治疗。但这种做法的长期临床影响尚不清楚。

方法

采用倾向评分调整的患者水平荟萃分析,比较了 3 项大规模 TAXUS 试验(波士顿科学公司,马萨诸塞州纳提克)中接受常规血管造影随访的患者与仅接受临床随访的患者的长期结局。还比较了在血管造影随访中检测到的治疗与未治疗的非缺血性中间病变(定量血管造影狭窄>40%且<70%)患者的结局。

结果

在血管造影随访组,5 年时靶病变血运重建(TLR)率明显高于临床随访组(18.3% vs. 11.1%,p<0.001)。这是由于更频繁地治疗中间病变,但与心脏死亡或心肌梗死发生率(8.9% vs. 8.8%,p=0.93)无相关性。在非缺血性中间病变患者中,17%的患者在血管造影随访时未进行血运重建,随后有 TLR,而在该随访血管造影中发生 TLR 的 7%的患者在长期随访中需要进一步血运重建。

结论

常规血管造影随访策略增加了非缺血性中间病变的再狭窄血管重建,而不影响随后的心脏死亡或心肌梗死发生率,并且 83%的病变不需要进行 TLR。在出现复发缺血或症状进展的患者中重复进行血管造影的保守方法可最大限度地减少非缺血性中间病变的重复血运重建,并优化药物洗脱支架置入后无事件生存的长期结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验