Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Clin Ther. 2010 Mar;32(3):437-53. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.03.012.
BACKGROUND: Two groups of agents targeting either the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor or the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) have been added to the therapeutic arsenal against metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Currently available agents in these groups are the anti-VEGF antibody bevacizumab and the anti-EGFR antibodies cetuximab and panitumumab. OBJECTIVES: This article reviews the results of prospective randomized clinical trials of anti-VEGF and anti-EGFR antibodies in mCRC, either as monotherapy, combined with chemotherapy, or combined with each other. Also reviewed are retrospective subset analyses of the effect of a KRAS mutation on the response to anti-EGFR antibodies. METHODS: MEDLINE (2004-2009) was searched for randomized Phase II-III clinical trials of monoclonal antibodies in mCRC published in English. The search terms were colorectal neoplasms, bevacizumab, cetuximab, panitumumab, and KRAS mutation, alone or in combination. Information on the effect of KRAS mutation status on the response to anti-EGFR antibodies was drawn from retrospective subset analyses within the selected trials. RESULTS: The literature search identified 5 trials of bevacizumab in mCRC. Of these trials, 3 found a significant benefit on the primary end point (progression-free survival [PFS] or overall survival [OS]) when bevacizumab was added to chemotherapy, either as first-line (2 trials) or second-line (1 trial) treatment. The literature search identified 5 trials of cetuximab and 1 trial of panitumumab in mCRC. Of these trials, 4 found a significant benefit on the primary end point (response rate, PFS, or OS) with cetuximab or panitumumab as monotherapy or added to chemotherapy, either as first-line (1 trial) or later-line (3 trials) treatment. In all trials, the benefit of anti-EGFR therapy was limited to patients who had KRAS wild-type tumors. Of 3 identified trials of combined anti-EGFR and anti-VEGF therapy, 2 found that the combination of an anti-EGFR antibody and the anti-VEGF antibody bevacizumab had a significant negative effect on the primary end point (PFS) compared with no added anti-EGFR antibody. CONCLUSIONS: In the studies reviewed, the anti-VEGF antibody bevacizumab added to chemotherapy and the anti-EGFR antibodies cetuximab and panitumumab as monotherapy or added to chemotherapy were associated with consistent efficacy in the treatment of mCRC, although the absolute benefit differed among trials. The efficacy of anti-EGFR antibodies was limited to patients with KRAS wild-type tumors. Given the lack of benefit when anti-VEGF and anti-EGFR antibodies were combined, such regimens should not be used in clinical practice.
背景:针对转移性结直肠癌(mCRC),已经有两组靶向血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)受体或表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)的药物添加到治疗方案中。目前这些药物组中的药物有抗 VEGF 抗体贝伐珠单抗和抗 EGFR 抗体西妥昔单抗和帕尼单抗。
目的:本文综述了贝伐单抗和抗 EGFR 抗体单药治疗、联合化疗或联合应用治疗 mCRC 的前瞻性随机临床试验结果,同时回顾了 KRAS 突变对 EGFR 抗体反应的影响的回顾性亚组分析结果。
方法:使用 MEDLINE(2004-2009 年)检索 2004 年至 2009 年期间以英文发表的 mCRC 中单克隆抗体的随机 II-III 期临床试验。检索词包括结直肠肿瘤、贝伐珠单抗、西妥昔单抗、帕尼单抗和 KRAS 突变,单独或联合使用。从选定试验的回顾性亚组分析中提取有关 KRAS 突变状态对 EGFR 抗体反应影响的信息。
结果:文献检索确定了 5 项贝伐珠单抗治疗 mCRC 的试验。其中 3 项研究发现,贝伐珠单抗联合化疗作为一线(2 项研究)或二线(1 项研究)治疗时,在主要终点(无进展生存期[PFS]或总生存期[OS])上有显著获益。文献检索确定了 5 项西妥昔单抗和 1 项帕尼单抗治疗 mCRC 的试验。其中 4 项研究发现,西妥昔单抗或帕尼单抗单药治疗或联合化疗作为一线(1 项研究)或二线(3 项研究)治疗时,在主要终点(缓解率、PFS 或 OS)上有显著获益。在所有试验中,EGFR 治疗的获益仅限于 KRAS 野生型肿瘤患者。在 3 项联合抗 EGFR 和抗 VEGF 治疗的试验中,有 2 项研究发现,与未添加抗 EGFR 抗体相比,抗 EGFR 抗体联合抗 VEGF 抗体贝伐珠单抗对主要终点(PFS)有显著的负向影响。
结论:在综述的研究中,贝伐珠单抗联合化疗、西妥昔单抗和帕尼单抗单药治疗或联合化疗与 mCRC 的治疗效果一致,尽管不同试验的绝对获益不同。EGFR 抗体的疗效仅限于 KRAS 野生型肿瘤患者。鉴于抗 VEGF 和抗 EGFR 抗体联合应用时没有获益,因此此类方案不应用于临床实践。
World J Gastroenterol. 2015-4-14
Int J Mol Cell Med. 2025
Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz). 2023-8-26
J Funct Biomater. 2021-12-16
Int J Mol Sci. 2021-6-16
JCO Precis Oncol. 2018-7-16
J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2020-5-19