Schneider Darryl W, Anderson John R
Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010 Oct;63(10):1873-94. doi: 10.1080/17470211003624010. Epub 2010 Apr 15.
When switching between tasks of unequal difficulty, there is often a larger switch cost for the easy task than for the difficult task. The authors propose a new account of these asymmetric switch costs based on sequential difficulty effects. They argue that the asymmetry arises from impaired performance after a difficult trial regardless of whether the task switches or repeats. Empirical support for this idea is provided in two experiments on arithmetic task switching in which asymmetries are observed for secondary difficulty manipulations, even in the context of arithmetic task repetitions. The authors discuss how their sequential difficulty account might explain asymmetric restart costs in addition to asymmetric switch costs and how sequential difficulty effects might be explained by resource depletion involving executive control or working memory.
当在难度不等的任务之间进行切换时,通常简单任务的切换成本比困难任务的切换成本更大。作者基于顺序难度效应提出了一种对这些不对称切换成本的新解释。他们认为,这种不对称性源于困难试验后的表现受损,无论任务是切换还是重复。在两项关于算术任务切换的实验中为这一观点提供了实证支持,其中即使在算术任务重复的情况下,对于次要难度操作也观察到了不对称性。作者讨论了他们的顺序难度解释如何除了不对称切换成本之外还能解释不对称重启成本,以及顺序难度效应如何可能由涉及执行控制或工作记忆的资源耗竭来解释。