• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

报告区域性用药错误数据共享系统中的趋势。

Reporting trends in a regional medication error data-sharing system.

机构信息

Department of Sociology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907-2059, USA.

出版信息

Health Care Manag Sci. 2010 Mar;13(1):74-83. doi: 10.1007/s10729-009-9111-1.

DOI:10.1007/s10729-009-9111-1
PMID:20402284
Abstract

Inter-organizational systems for sharing data about medication errors have emerged as an important strategy for improving patient safety and are expected to encourage not only voluntary error reporting but also learning from errors. Yet, few studies have examined the hypothesized benefits of inter-organizational data sharing. The current study examined the developmental trends in information reported by hospitals participating in a regional reporting system for medication errors. A coalition of hospitals in southwestern Pennsylvania, under the auspices of the Pittsburgh Regional Healthcare Initiative (PRHI), implemented a voluntary system for quarterly sharing of information about medication errors. Over a 12-month period, 25 hospitals shared information about 17,000 medication errors. Using latent growth curve analysis, we examined longitudinal trends in the quarterly number of errors and associated corrective actions reported by each hospital. Controlling for size, teaching status, and JCAHO accreditation score, for the hospitals as a group, error reporting increased at a statistically significant rate over the four quarters. Moreover, despite significant baseline differences among hospitals, error reporting increased at similar rates across hospitals over subsequent quarters. In contrast, the reporting of corrective actions remained unchanged. However, the baseline levels of corrective actions reporting were significantly different across hospitals. Although data sharing systems promote error reporting, it is unclear whether they encourage corrective actions. If data sharing is intended to promote not just error reporting but also root-cause-analysis and process improvement, then the design of the reporting system should emphasize data about these processes as well as errors.

摘要

医疗机构间分享用药错误数据的系统已经成为提高患者安全的一项重要策略,预计不仅能鼓励自愿报告错误,还能从错误中学习。然而,很少有研究检验过医疗机构间数据共享的假设益处。本研究考察了参与用药错误区域报告系统的医院所报告信息的发展趋势。在匹兹堡地区医疗保健倡议(PRHI)的主持下,宾夕法尼亚州西南部的一个医院联盟实施了一项针对用药错误的季度信息自愿共享系统。在 12 个月的时间里,25 家医院分享了约 17000 例用药错误的信息。通过潜在增长曲线分析,我们考察了每个医院每季度报告的错误数量和相关纠正措施的纵向趋势。在控制了规模、教学地位和 JCAHO 认证评分后,就医院整体而言,错误报告在四个季度内以统计学显著的速度增加。此外,尽管医院之间存在显著的基线差异,但在随后的几个季度中,错误报告的增长率在各医院之间基本一致。相比之下,纠正措施的报告保持不变。然而,各医院之间的纠正措施报告的基线水平存在显著差异。尽管数据共享系统促进了错误报告,但尚不清楚它们是否鼓励了纠正措施。如果数据共享不仅旨在促进错误报告,还旨在促进根本原因分析和流程改进,那么报告系统的设计就应该强调这些流程以及错误的数据。

相似文献

1
Reporting trends in a regional medication error data-sharing system.报告区域性用药错误数据共享系统中的趋势。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2010 Mar;13(1):74-83. doi: 10.1007/s10729-009-9111-1.
2
Your Health Care May Kill You: Medical Errors.你的医疗保健可能会要了你的命:医疗差错。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;234:13-17.
3
Translating research into practice: voluntary reporting of medication errors in critical access hospitals.将研究转化为实践:基层医疗急救医院中用药错误的自愿报告
J Rural Health. 2004 Fall;20(4):335-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2004.tb00047.x.
4
Medication errors: an analysis comparing PHICO's closed claims data and PHICO's Event Reporting Trending System (PERTS).用药差错:一项比较PHICO的结案索赔数据与PHICO事件报告趋势系统(PERTS)的分析。
J Clin Pharmacol. 2003 Jul;43(7):754-9.
5
Internally-developed electronic reporting system for medication errors.内部开发的用药错误电子报告系统。
Ir Med J. 2009 Jul-Aug;102(7):223-4.
6
Systems factors in the reporting of serious medication errors in hospitals.医院中严重用药错误报告的系统因素。
J Med Syst. 2003 Dec;27(6):543-51. doi: 10.1023/a:1025985832133.
7
Inter-rater reliability of medication error classification in a voluntary patient safety incident reporting system HaiPro in Finland.芬兰 HaiPro 自愿性患者安全事件报告系统中药物错误分类的评价者间信度。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2019 Jul;15(7):864-872. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.11.013. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
8
What is the measure of a safe hospital? Medication errors missed by risk management, clinical staff, and surveyors.安全医院的衡量标准是什么?是风险管理、临床工作人员和调查人员遗漏的用药错误。
J Psychiatr Pract. 2005 Jul;11(4):268-73. doi: 10.1097/00131746-200507000-00008.
9
Medication error reporting in long term care.长期护理中的用药错误报告
Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2004 Sep;2(3):190-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2004.09.003.
10
Are medication error rates useful as comparative measures of organizational performance?
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1994 Apr;20(4):192-9. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30061-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Improvement proposals and actions in medication error reports: Quality and strength: A cross-sectional study.用药错误报告中的改进建议与行动:质量与力度:一项横断面研究。
Health Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 18;7(9):e70077. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70077. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Clinical incident reporting behaviors and associated factors among health professionals in Dessie comprehensive specialized hospital, Amhara Region, Ethiopia: a mixed method study.埃塞俄比亚阿姆哈拉地区德西综合专科医院卫生专业人员临床事件报告行为及其影响因素:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Dec 11;21(1):1331. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07350-y.
3
Applying Task-Technology Fit Model to the Healthcare Sector: a Case Study of Hospitals' Computed Tomography Patient-Referral Mechanism.

本文引用的文献

1
Health care IT collaboration in Massachusetts: the experience of creating regional connectivity.马萨诸塞州的医疗保健信息技术合作:创建区域连通性的经验。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005 Nov-Dec;12(6):596-601. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1866. Epub 2005 Jul 27.
2
Five years after To Err Is Human: what have we learned?《人非圣贤,孰能无过》出版五年后:我们学到了什么?
JAMA. 2005 May 18;293(19):2384-90. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.19.2384.
3
Evidence-based quality improvement: the state of the science.基于证据的质量改进:科学现状
应用任务-技术适配模型于医疗保健领域:以医院计算机断层扫描患者转诊机制为例。
J Med Syst. 2015 Aug;39(8):80. doi: 10.1007/s10916-015-0264-9. Epub 2015 Jul 1.
4
Advantages and Disadvantages of Health Care Accreditation Mod-els.医疗保健认证模式的优缺点。
Health Promot Perspect. 2011 Jul 25;1(1):1-31. doi: 10.5681/hpp.2011.001. eCollection 2011.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Jan-Feb;24(1):138-50. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.24.1.138.
4
The end of the beginning: patient safety five years after 'to err is human'.开端的结束:《人非圣贤,孰能无过》发表五年后的患者安全
Health Aff (Millwood). 2004 Jul-Dec;Suppl Web Exclusives:W4-534-45. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.w4.534.
5
Improving patient safety--five years after the IOM report.改善患者安全——医学研究所报告发布五年后
N Engl J Med. 2004 Nov 11;351(20):2041-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp048243.
6
Pittsburgh Regional Healthcare Initiative: a systems approach for achieving perfect patient care.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2003 Sep-Oct;22(5):157-65. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.22.5.157.
7
Reporting of adverse events.不良事件报告。
N Engl J Med. 2002 Nov 14;347(20):1633-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMNEJMhpr011493.
8
Gaps in the continuity of care and progress on patient safety.医疗护理连续性方面的差距以及患者安全的进展情况。
BMJ. 2000 Mar 18;320(7237):791-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7237.791.
9
The incident reporting system does not detect adverse drug events: a problem for quality improvement.事件报告系统无法检测到药物不良事件:这是质量改进中的一个问题。
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1995 Oct;21(10):541-8. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30180-8.
10
Computerized surveillance of adverse drug events in hospital patients.医院患者药物不良事件的计算机化监测
JAMA. 1991 Nov 27;266(20):2847-51.