Yang Chao-Chin, Wan Chin-Shen, Chiou Wen-Bin
National Kaohsiung Hospitality College.
Psychol Rep. 2010 Feb;106(1):79-92. doi: 10.2466/PR0.106.1.79-92.
This study used a post-Piagetian perspective to investigate the relation of dialectical thinking and creative performance in early adulthood. The modified version of the Social Paradigm Belief Scale was employed to measure the development of formal and dialectical thinking among 454 young adults, ages 23 to 40 years (M = 32.1, SD = 4.8). The Divergent Thinking Test estimated their creative performance. Scores on dialectical thinking were positively correlated and scores on formal thinking were negatively correlated with Divergent Thinking Test scores. Planned contrasts indicated that participants in the dialectical thinking group scored higher than did those in the formal thinking group on the six dimensions of the Divergent Thinking Test, i.e., Fluency, Openness, Flexibility, Originality, Elaboration, and Naming. Multiple discriminant analysis with a cross-validation examination showed the linear combination of scores on the six dimensions of creativity included in the Divergent Thinking Test discriminated between formal and dialectical thinking groups; this supported predictions about the relation between postformal thinking and creativity among young adults.
本研究采用后皮亚杰视角来探究成年早期辩证思维与创造性表现之间的关系。使用社会范式信念量表的修订版来测量454名年龄在23至40岁(M = 32.1,SD = 4.8)的年轻人形式思维和辩证思维的发展情况。发散性思维测试评估了他们的创造性表现。辩证思维得分与发散性思维测试得分呈正相关,形式思维得分与发散性思维测试得分呈负相关。计划对比表明,在发散性思维测试的流畅性、开放性、灵活性、独创性、细致性和命名这六个维度上,辩证思维组的参与者得分高于形式思维组的参与者。带有交叉验证检验的多重判别分析表明,发散性思维测试中包含的创造力六个维度得分的线性组合能够区分形式思维组和辩证思维组;这支持了关于成年早期后形式思维与创造力之间关系的预测。