Wu Pai-Lu, Chiou Wen-Bin
Center for Teacher Education, Cheng Shiu University, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Adolescence. 2008 Summer;43(170):237-51.
This study investigated the relationship between cognitive development levels and creative performance among late adolescents from a post-Piagetian perspective. Participants were 386 college students, ranging in age from 19 to 26 years. The Social Paradigm Belief Scale was employed to measure the three cognitive styles of late adolescence: formal, relativistic, and dialectical thinking. The Divergent Thinking Test (DTT) was used to measure creative performance. Dialectical and relativistic thinking were positively correlated with creative performance, whereas formal thinking was negatively correlated. Planned contrasts revealed that postformal thinkers scored higher than formal thinkers in all dimensions of creativity, and additional MANOVA analysis exhibited a similar pattern. Multiple discriminant analysis showed that the linear combination of the six dimensions of creativity recognized in the DTT discriminated between formal and postformal thinkers, which supported our findings about the relationship between postformal thinking and creativity. Future research directions and implications for creativity pedagogy are discussed.
本研究从后皮亚杰主义视角探讨了青少年晚期认知发展水平与创造性表现之间的关系。参与者为386名大学生,年龄在19至26岁之间。采用社会范式信念量表来测量青少年晚期的三种认知风格:形式思维、相对主义思维和辩证思维。发散性思维测试(DTT)用于测量创造性表现。辩证思维和相对主义思维与创造性表现呈正相关,而形式思维则呈负相关。计划性对比显示,后形式思维者在创造力的各个维度上得分均高于形式思维者,额外的多变量方差分析也呈现出类似模式。多重判别分析表明,DTT中所认可的创造力六个维度的线性组合能够区分形式思维者和后形式思维者,这支持了我们关于后形式思维与创造力之间关系的研究结果。文中还讨论了未来的研究方向以及对创造力教学法的启示。