Suppr超能文献

抗精神病药和心境稳定剂在儿童和成人双相 I 型躁狂症患者中的疗效和耐受性:急性、随机、安慰剂对照试验的比较分析。

Antipsychotic and mood stabilizer efficacy and tolerability in pediatric and adult patients with bipolar I mania: a comparative analysis of acute, randomized, placebo-controlled trials.

机构信息

The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Psychiatry Research, North Shore-Long Island Jewish Health System, Glen Oaks, NY 11004, USA.

出版信息

Bipolar Disord. 2010 Mar;12(2):116-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2010.00798.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare antipsychotic and mood stabilizer (MS) efficacy and tolerability in youth and adults with bipolar mania.

METHODS

Medline/PubMed search for studies including: (i) youth (< 18 years) or adults (> or = 18 years); (ii) bipolar I disorder; (iii) double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (DB-RPCT); (iv) < or = 12 weeks of treatment; and (v) calculable effect sizes (ES) and/or numbers needed to treat/harm (NNT/NNH) +/- 95% confidence intervals (CI). Non-overlapping 95% CIs determined significant group differences.

RESULTS

We identified nine DB-RPCTs in youth (n = 1,609), 5 evaluating second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) (n = 1,140) and 4 evaluating MSs (n = 469). We also identified 23 DB-RPCTs in adults (n = 6,501), 14 including SGAs (n = 3,297), 5 using haloperidol as an active comparator (n = 580), and 11 including MSs (n = 2,581). Young Mania Rating Scale scores improved significantly more with SGAs than MSs in youth (ES = 0.65, CI: 0.53-0.78 versus 0.24, CI: 0.06-0.41) and adults (ES = 0.48, CI: 0.41-0.55 versus 0.24, CI: 0.17-0.31). After excluding topiramate studies, SGAs had larger ES than MSs only in youth (ES = 0.65, CI: 0.53-0.78 versus 0.20, CI: 0.02-0.39), but not adults (ES = 0.48, CI: 0.41-0.55 versus 0.46, CI: 0.37-0.55). However, in adults SGAs had significantly larger ES regarding Clinical Global Impressions scores than MSs, even without topiramate (ES = 0.75, CI: 0.68-0.82 versus 0.24, CI: 0.07-0.41). Rates of response, remission, and discontinuation due to any reason compared to placebo were similar between medication and age groups, except for more favorable NNTs for remission with SGAs than MSs in adults after excluding topiramate. SGAs caused more weight gain than MSs in youth (ES = 0.53, CI: 0.41-0.66 versus 0.10, CI: -0.12-0.33), but not in adults (ES = 0.13, CI: 0.05-0.22 versus 0.00, CI: -0.08-0.08). However, results were heterogeneous and not significant in either age group after excluding topiramate. Nevertheless, SGA-related weight gain was significantly greater in youth than adults. In youth, SGA-related somnolence was greater than with MSs (NNH = 4.7, CI: 3.9-6.0 versus 9.5, CI: 6.3-23.5), and more likely than in adults (NNH = 7.1, CI: 6.1-8.8). Conversely, youth experienced less akathisia with SGAs than adults (NNH = 20.4, CI: 14.1-36.5 versus 10.2, CI: 8.1-13.7), likely due to lower doses/slower titration.

CONCLUSIONS

In treating mania, potentially greater short-term efficacy compared to placebo with SGAs versus MS needs to be balanced against increased adverse events, especially in youth.

摘要

目的

比较抗精神病药和心境稳定剂(MS)在双相情感障碍躁狂患者中的疗效和耐受性。

方法

通过 Medline/PubMed 搜索包括以下内容的研究:(i)青年(<18 岁)或成人(≥18 岁);(ii)双相 I 型障碍;(iii)双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验(DB-RPCT);(iv)<或=12 周的治疗;和(v)可计算的效应大小(ES)和/或需要治疗/危害的人数(NNT/NNH)±95%置信区间(CI)。不重叠的 95%CI 确定了显著的组间差异。

结果

我们确定了九项在青年中进行的 DB-RPCT 研究(n=1609),其中五项评估第二代抗精神病药(SGAs)(n=1140),四项评估心境稳定剂(MSs)(n=469)。我们还确定了 23 项在成人中进行的 DB-RPCT 研究(n=6501),其中 14 项包括 SGAs(n=3297),5 项使用氟哌啶醇作为活性对照(n=580),11 项包括 MSs(n=2581)。在青年中,与 MSs 相比,SGAs 可显著改善躁狂症状评定量表评分(ES=0.65,CI:0.53-0.78 与 0.24,CI:0.06-0.41)和成人(ES=0.48,CI:0.41-0.55 与 0.24,CI:0.17-0.31)。在排除托吡酯研究后,SGAs 在青年中的 ES 大于 MSs,而在成人中则不然(ES=0.65,CI:0.53-0.78 与 0.20,CI:0.02-0.39)。然而,在成人中,SGAs 与 MSs 相比,即使不包括托吡酯,临床总体印象评分的 ES 也更大(ES=0.75,CI:0.68-0.82 与 0.24,CI:0.07-0.41)。与安慰剂相比,药物和年龄组之间的反应率、缓解率和因任何原因停药率相似,除了在排除托吡酯后,成人中使用 SGAs 比 MSs 更有利于缓解的 NNTs。与 MSs 相比,SGAs 在青年中引起更多的体重增加(ES=0.53,CI:0.41-0.66 与 0.10,CI:-0.12-0.33),但在成人中则不然(ES=0.13,CI:0.05-0.22 与 0.00,CI:-0.08-0.08)。然而,在排除托吡酯后,这两个年龄组的结果均不一致且不显著。然而,SGAs 相关的体重增加在青年中明显大于成人。在青年中,SGAs 相关的嗜睡发生率高于 MSs(NNH=4.7,CI:3.9-6.0 与 9.5,CI:6.3-23.5),而且比成人更易发生(NNH=7.1,CI:6.1-8.8)。相反,青年患者使用 SGAs 时出现静坐不能的可能性低于成人(NNH=20.4,CI:14.1-36.5 与 10.2,CI:8.1-13.7),这可能是由于剂量较低/滴定较慢。

结论

在治疗躁狂症时,与安慰剂相比,SGAs 与 MSs 相比可能具有更大的短期疗效,但需要权衡不良反应增加的风险,尤其是在青年患者中。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验