Suppr超能文献

一项为期 6 个月的前瞻性、随机对照试验,旨在比较定制的依从性增强方案与双相情感障碍特定教育对照方案,以改善依从性不佳的青少年和年轻成人双相情感障碍患者的治疗结局。

A 6-month, prospective, randomized controlled trial of customized adherence enhancement versus a bipolar-specific educational control in poorly adherent adolescents and young adults living with bipolar disorder.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

Bipolar Disord. 2024 Nov;26(7):696-707. doi: 10.1111/bdi.13489. Epub 2024 Sep 4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Few studies have addressed medication adherence in adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with bipolar disorder (BD). This 6-month prospective randomized-controlled trial (RCT) tested customized adherence enhancement for adolescents and young adults (CAE-AYA), a behavioral intervention for AYAs versus enhanced treatment as usual (ETAU).

METHODS

Inclusion criteria were AYAs age 13-21 with BD type I or II with suboptimal adherence defined as missing ≥20% of medications. Assessments were conducted at Screening, Baseline, and weeks 8, 12 and 24. Primary outcome was past 7 day self-reported Tablets Routine Questionnaire (TRQ) validated by electronic pillbox monitoring (SimpleMed). Symptom measures included the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) and Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS).

RESULTS

The mean sample age (N = 36) was 19.1 years (SD = 2.0); 66.7% (N = 24) female, BD Type I (81%). The mean missed medication on TRQ for the total sample was 35.4% (SD = 28.8) at screening and 30.4% (SD = 30.5) at baseline. Both CAE-AYA and ETAU improved on TRQ from screening to baseline. Baseline mean missed medication using SimpleMed was 51.6% (SD = 38.5). Baseline HAM-D and YMRS means were 7.1 (SD = 4.7) and 6.0 (SD = 7.3), respectively. Attrition rate at week 24 was 36%. Baseline to 24-week change on TRQ, adjusting for age, gender, educational level, living situation, family history, race, and ethnicity, showed improvement favoring CAE-AYA versus ETAU of 15%. SimpleMed interpretation was limited due to substantial missing data. There was a significant reduction in depression favoring CAE-AYA.

CONCLUSIONS

CAE-AYA may improve adherence in AYAs with BD, although conclusions need to be made cautiously given study limitations.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04348604.

摘要

目的

很少有研究探讨双相情感障碍(BD)青少年和年轻人(AYA)的药物依从性。本 6 个月前瞻性随机对照试验(RCT)测试了针对 AYA 的定制药物依从性增强(CAE-AYA),这是一种针对 AYA 的行为干预,与增强的常规治疗(ETAU)相比。

方法

纳入标准为年龄在 13-21 岁的 AYA,BD 为 I 型或 II 型,药物依从性定义为错过药物≥20%。评估在筛选、基线和第 8、12 和 24 周进行。主要结局是过去 7 天的自我报告的片剂常规问卷(TRQ),通过电子药盒监测(SimpleMed)进行验证。症状测量包括汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HAM-D)和 Young 躁狂评定量表(YMRS)。

结果

平均样本年龄(N=36)为 19.1 岁(SD=2.0);66.7%(N=24)为女性,BD 类型 I(81%)。总样本在 TRQ 上错过的药物平均值为筛选时的 35.4%(SD=28.8)和基线时的 30.4%(SD=30.5)。CAE-AYA 和 ETAU 均从筛选到基线提高了 TRQ。使用 SimpleMed 的基线平均漏药率为 51.6%(SD=38.5)。基线 HAM-D 和 YMRS 平均值分别为 7.1(SD=4.7)和 6.0(SD=7.3)。第 24 周的失访率为 36%。调整年龄、性别、教育水平、生活状况、家族史、种族和民族后,TRQ 从基线到 24 周的变化显示,CAE-AYA 优于 ETAU 的改善为 15%。由于数据缺失严重,SimpleMed 的解释受到限制。CAE-AYA 显著降低了抑郁症状。

结论

CAE-AYA 可能会改善 BD 青少年和年轻人的药物依从性,尽管考虑到研究的局限性,需要谨慎得出结论。

临床试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT04348604。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验